Author: Andy_brown Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 12:49 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
You used to be able to pick this up downtown before the US Printing Office closed their store. It can be very helpful in understanding the assignments between D.C. and light. |
|
Author: Broadway Tuesday, December 02, 2008 - 7:20 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Interesting chart here...what's mind blowing to me is the the higher the frequency the more things turn to pure light? Kind of a spiritual thing? |
|
Author: Skeptical Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 12:51 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Kind of a spiritual thing? |
|
Author: Broadway Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 9:05 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Great...glad you found "him"...don't have a "reciever" to pick up that frequency...someone tune in and give a DX report...actually God invented physics...but back to the chart, it amazes me how small we can get a radio wave this days. |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 10:09 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1420.40575 MHz is one of the emission lines of hydrogen. Listeners may find a "hiss" on this frequency that changes in intensity with the time of day. |
|
Author: Mrs_merkin Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 10:26 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I hear a constant "hiss" from Broadway's frequency. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 11:26 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It takes a little effort to hear a signal on 1420.40575: |
|
Author: Broadway Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 9:33 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
>>changes in intensity with the time of day |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 11:04 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The "changes in intensity with the time of day" came out of a Wikipedia article. In the 1930s, this radio noise was first detected, but the engineers and scientists of the day had no clue what was causing it. They suspected that the source was extraterrestrial and that the change in intensity was due to the rotation of the Earth. |
|
Author: Skeptical Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 11:26 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
1420 Mhz is among the quietest frequency in regard to background noise in our universe. With hydrogen being the most common element found in the universe, scientists in general and astronomers in particular have deduced that 1420 Mhz would be the most likely "hailing" frequency used by any intelligent life form. Free of most background noise, existing technology permits listening almost as far away as the next galaxy. |
|
Author: Skybill Wednesday, December 03, 2008 - 11:27 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That's quite elaborate setup they have!! |
|
Author: Jr_tech Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 12:13 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
What are you using for an antenna? If you have an old 10 foot (or so) sat dish and make a "coffee can" feed for it, you might detect a change in the noise floor a the sun passes in front of the dish. |
|
Author: Skybill Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 12:26 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm just using the rubber duckie that came with the unit. |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 11:05 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
If it takes a 10' dish to receive the 1420.40575 MHz radiation from the sun, then I assume that a gas discharge tube filled with hydrogen (sometimes called a Geissler tube) would probably emit so little energy at this frequency as to be difficult or impossible to detect. Dr Hendrik van de Hulst, the scientist who, in 1944, gave an explanation of how excited hydrogen atoms might radiate at 1420.40575 was working purely on a theoretical level; he didn't actually detect the microwave emissions with a laboratory setup. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 12:51 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't *know* if a 10 foot dish will do the job without a good LNA as used in the article that I linked above. I played a bit several years ago using a coffee can feedhorn mounted (duct tape) on an old 10 foot dish, feeding directly into an ICOM8500, and could not convince myself that that I could see a signal change. I suspect that Bills' Anritsu MS2721A Spectrum Analyzer might be a better receiver than the ICOM. |
|
Author: Monkeyboy Thursday, December 04, 2008 - 2:41 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
That chart has come in handy more than a dozen times for me! |
|