Author: Darkstar Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 6:08 pm |
|
Well, I haven't seen it mentioned elsewhere, but I'm now receiving the Watch TV multiplex of channels on DTV channel 16 (KORS). |
|
Author: Jr_tech Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 7:13 pm |
|
I am getting it also... although listed as a Salem channel, it appears to be transmitting from the West Hills: |
|
Author: Drchaps Tuesday, November 04, 2008 - 10:38 pm |
|
What's on them? |
|
Author: Darkstar Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 6:17 am |
|
HSN, Bohemia, and it appears the Jewelry channel is coming soon (just bars/tone right now). |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 10:09 am |
|
I'm a little confused. The FCC lists it as an application! I'll do some checking. |
|
Author: Darkstar Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 11:39 am |
|
Hmm... That's not good :-) |
|
Author: Andy_brown Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 11:47 am |
|
They are operating under an ongoing STA (temporary authority) |
|
Author: Jr_tech Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 12:33 pm |
|
I may be wrong here, but I thought that the STA was to permit analog broadcasting on (digital) ch 16 rather than 36 in Salem because of a local interference problem. Now it appears that they have modified the CP (move to Portland) and started broadcasting in digital while operating under the same STA ? |
|
Author: Motozak2 Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 4:06 pm |
|
I can't get 16 at all here....... :o( |
|
Author: Jr_tech Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 4:52 pm |
|
From just north of Hillsboro, on a Sony HDTV, I get a signal strength of "27"*... most other Portland channels are running high 80's to mid 90's. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 11:20 pm |
|
Thank you for the explanation, Andy! I'm not completely clear on a couple of points, possibly because I haven't personally received the station. It sounds like they are operating digitally on channel 16. Is that from the west hills or the old location near Salem? I talked to my sister on the phone. She was at our mother's house. She was fiddling with the digital converter box so I asked her to punch in "1, 6". She said she got nothing but she may have scanned it instead. I can't be sure. There's a roof antenna aimed at the TV towers and all the main digital stations decode just fine. I would think it would at least come in well enough to be full of artifacts. I'll go over in a few days and check it out myself. One of these days, I'm going to disconnect the channel 22 yagi antenna and channel 22 splitter that are connected through the main antenna. That should help any future low power digital stations. |
|
Author: Andy_brown Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 11:42 pm |
|
Both their license and application are for Salem, but from different sites. All the info is located and/or linked to: |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, November 05, 2008 - 11:48 pm |
|
That link was part of my confusion in the first place! As long as we're here, why is it OK to have a translator licensed to a COL that doesn't even begin to reach it? |
|
Author: Andy_brown Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 12:07 am |
|
It's not totally clear how they get away with it. The coverage overlaps and provides interference relief. BTW, It's a CA (low power tv), not a translator. |
|
Author: Andy_brown Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 12:19 am |
|
It appears to be on the KGW tower based on the co-ordinates. |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 12:51 am |
|
This is a very interesting concept, not unlike KFI remaining licensed to LA, even though they've moved to Medford! Wait a minute, there's another "Oak Grove"? There's already one near Hood River. That make's at least 3! |
|
Author: Kb101engineer Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 7:25 am |
|
What is the difference between a CA and an LP? |
|
Author: Jr_tech Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 9:05 am |
|
I asked her to punch in "1, 6" |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 11:58 am |
|
(slaps hand to side of head)Thank you, it's a whole new world! |
|
Author: Andy_brown Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 12:06 pm |
|
What is the difference between a CA and an LP? |
|
Author: Kb101engineer Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 12:43 pm |
|
Thanks. That answers a question that I have wondered about for a long time. |
|
Author: Motozak2 Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 1:50 pm |
|
Interestingly enough, I can't even get any sort of copy of KORS-CA on my Digitalstream box at the apartment. (I won't even try using the Pansat for this stuff, as its ATSC section is a very, very poor DX tuner--possibly my one and only bitch about the Pansat! It's far better suited for the local stuff.) |
|
Author: Jimbo Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 4:12 pm |
|
My Apex and Zenith converters only need 1 6 punched in and they will go to 16-1 even if it is not scanned. My Channel Master will not. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 5:04 pm |
|
I just tried my Panasonic EZ47 (DVD/VHS recorder with ATSC tuner). Only after a scan (it had not been connected to an antenna for months), it found 16.1 when I punched in "16". On the remote, I must use a hyphen instead of a period that the Sony remote uses (16-2 instead of 16.2). |
|
Author: Scott_young Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 10:39 pm |
|
My Digital Stream box has no audio on 16.1 or 16.2. Not sure why, but given their programming I guess it's no great loss... |
|
Author: Jr_tech Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 11:06 pm |
|
Just checked using the ATSC tuner in my Panasonic recorder and Sony TV, the sound on 16.1, 16.2, 16.3 is still working ok... weird that some boxes are not receiving it ! |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, November 06, 2008 - 11:53 pm |
|
The slap to the side of my head being fresh in my mind(unintentional humor), I went over to my mother's house and pressed in "16.1" and "16.2". This was ineffective with the converter box. Whether the problem was that this particular box needs a really strong signal to decode or that having 2 antennae connected together is bringing down the level too far, I cannot say. All I know is that it didn't work when I tried it. |
|
Author: Ke7jff Friday, November 07, 2008 - 11:59 pm |
|
I got it over here in Hillsboro with my indoor antenna facing due west |
|
Author: Jr_tech Saturday, November 08, 2008 - 9:59 am |
|
Reflection off the coast range? |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, November 09, 2008 - 12:29 am |
|
It's more likely the antennas were set up backward. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Sunday, November 09, 2008 - 10:22 am |
|
Indeed, that is very likely... many homeowners may not know which end of a "V" shaped log periodic to point at the towers, and end up aiming it like an arrow point. But, in the Hillsboro area, the signal from ch 49 from a hi gain antenna can overwhelm the front end of some TV or VCR tuners... turning the antenna around backwards is cheaper than using an attenuator to clean up the mess! |
|