Author: Bookemdono
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 7:49 pm
|
 
|
got me.
|
Author: Bookemdono
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 7:55 pm
|
 
|
plonk.
|
Author: Missing_kskd
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 7:56 pm
|
 
|
Well, that sucked!! -->sucked me right in!
|
Author: Bookemdono
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 7:58 pm
|
 
|
I guess a sucker is born every minute...as that interview was fictitious.
|
Author: Missing_kskd
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 7:59 pm
|
 
|
|
Author: Kennewickman
Wednesday, September 24, 2008 - 9:50 pm
|
 
|
This must be a case of 'future shock'...
|
Author: Bookemdono
Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 8:35 am
|
 
|
Sorry about that Missing. The reason I mistook the fictional interview with reality is because I had just finished watching the first half of Palin's interview with Katie Couric. I was trying to find the transcript of it so I could read for myself the part where Couric says "I'll ask you one more time" about providing examples of John McCain supporting financial regulation. "I'll try to find some and bring them to you." http://gawker.com/5054523/worst-of-sarah-palins-katie-couric-interview-so-far?au toplay=true Sometimes fact is almost as bad as fiction.
|
Author: Littlesongs
Thursday, September 25, 2008 - 9:38 am
|
 
|
Katie Couric: One-On-One With Sarah Palin
|
Author: Vitalogy
Friday, September 26, 2008 - 2:48 pm
|
 
|
Palin's interview should scare the hell out of people. She's so spectactularly unqualified and underwhelming, I think McCain threw the dice with her and will end up with snake eyes. No wonder the McCain camp is doing everything under their power to keep the camera and mic away from her. She is awful.
|
Author: Vitalogy
Friday, September 26, 2008 - 2:54 pm
|
 
|
(CNN) – Prominent conservative columnist Kathleen Parker, an early supporter of Republican VP candidate Sarah Palin, said Friday recent interviews have shown the Alaska governor is "out of her league" and should leave the GOP presidential ticket for the good of the party. The criticism in Parker's Friday column is the latest in a recent string of negative assessments toward the McCain-Palin candidacy from prominent conservatives. It was fun while it lasted," Parker writes. "Palin’s recent interviews with Charles Gibson, Sean Hannity, and now Katie Couric have all revealed an attractive, earnest, confident candidate. Who is clearly out of her league." Palin's interview with Couric drew criticism when the Alaska governor was unable to provide an example of when John McCain had pushed for more regulation of Wall Street during his Senate career. Palin also took heat for defending her foreign policy credentials by suggesting Russian leaders enter Alaska airspace when they come to America. Palin was also criticized last week for appearing not to know what the Bush Doctrine is during an interview with Charlie Gibson. “If BS were currency, Palin could bail out Wall Street herself," Parker also writes. "If Palin were a man, we’d all be guffawing, just as we do every time Joe Biden tickles the back of his throat with his toes. But because she’s a woman — and the first ever on a Republican presidential ticket — we are reluctant to say what is painfully true." Parker, who praised McCain's "keen judgment" for picking Palin earlier this month and wrote the Alaska governor is a "perfect storm of God, Mom and apple pie," now says Palin should step down from the ticket. “Only Palin can save McCain, her party, and the country she loves," Parker writes. She can bow out for personal reasons, perhaps because she wants to spend more time with her newborn. No one would criticize a mother who puts her family first. Do it for your country." Parker's comments follow those by prominent conservatives David Brooks, George Will, and David Frum who have all publicly questioned Palin's readiness to be vice president. "Sarah Palin has many virtues," Brooks wrote in a recent column. "If you wanted someone to destroy a corrupt establishment, she'd be your woman. But the constructive act of governance is another matter. She has not been engaged in national issues, does not have a repertoire of historic patterns and, like President Bush, she seems to compensate for her lack of experience with brashness and excessive decisiveness."
|
Author: Bookemdono
Friday, September 26, 2008 - 3:28 pm
|
 
|
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2008/09/26-4 "But Sarah Palin's performance in the tiny vignettes of unscripted dialogue in which we've been allowed to see her has been nothing short of frightening -- really, as I said, pity-inducing. And I say that as someone who has thought from the start that the criticisms of her abilities -- as opposed to her ideology -- were much too extreme. One of two things is absolutely clear at this point: she is either (a) completely ignorant about the most basic political issues -- a vacant, ill-informed, incurious know-nothing, or (b) aggressively concealing her actual beliefs about these matters because she's petrified of deviating from the simple-minded campaign talking points she's been fed and/or because her actual beliefs are so politically unpalatable, even when taking into account the right-wing extremism that is permitted, even rewarded, in our mainstream. I'm not really sure which is worse, but it doesn't really matter, because with 40 days left before the election, both options are heinous. What seems most likely is that she's perfectly conversant in the exceedingly narrow and parochial range of issues she's concerned herself with as Wasilla Mayor and Alaska Governor -- oil drilling on the North Slope, specific local budget items, corruption issues inside the Alaskan State GOP, and evangelical and religious matters. She really doesn't seem to have any thoughts about anything outside of that -- or if she does, she is suppressing them -- and is thus capable of spouting little more than empty right-wing slogans. That's what makes all the issues raised by the excellent on-scene reporting by Salon's David Talbot more significant than it otherwise might be -- she could be a religious fanatic with an extremist agenda, or a power-crazed, vendetta-fueled, secrecy-obsessed Cheney-ite, or something else altogether. She may not even know what she is, and we're clearly not going to find out. I've also thought for the last several weeks that people like Andrew Sullivan were being unduly critical of the McCain campaign's Palin media strategy. That strategy didn't strike me as particularly unusual or alarming. It's common for campaigns to be selective about their chosen interviewers, and it didn't strike me as significant -- or bothersome -- that they wanted to give Palin some time to acclimate to the national scene and prepare herself before submitting to standard press questions. I was wrong about that, too. Between that bizarre episode at the U.N. yesterday where they basically physically blocked her from answering even innocuous questions to their desire to "postpone" the Vice Presidential debate, it's now conclusively, disturbingly clear that the McCain campaign really does intend essentially to shield her from any and all media scrutiny until the election. I no longer think this is careful media strategizing by the McCain campaign but instead is motivated by what Greg Sargent said last night: The lengths the McCain campaign is going to in order to shield Sarah Palin from questioning are reaching truly comic dimensions . . . What's really sobering is that the McCain campaign continues to block Palin from answering questions even though it's now resulting in reams and reams of bad press for the McCain-Palin ticket. That suggests McCain advisers know that letting her answer even the most elementary questions in an uncontrolled environment is so dangerous that it's worth weathering the current media drubbing they're taking in order to prevent it from happening at all costs. Vice Presidents matter much more than they did before. So much unfettered power is now vested in the Executive that it's inevitable that the Vice President will wield significant authority. McCain evinces little interest in domestic policy, and the fact that he will be beholden to her and her Dobson-ite base if she wins makes it highly likely that she will exert substantial influence over numerous important areas. All of that, combined with McCain's age -- and what really do appear to be legitimate and growing questions about his health (those are mere suspicions, but appropriate ones that should be answered by McCain) -- makes Sarah Palin's candidacy a very real hazard, something that, by the day, I'm convinced is as important as any other issue in the campaign."
|
Author: Littlesongs
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 - 3:21 am
|
 
|
Debunking the Couric interview can be quite entertaining. Sarah Palin lies like a rug. Katie Couric: "You've cited Alaska's proximity to Russia as part of your foreign policy experience. What did you mean by that?" Sarah Palin: "That Alaska has a very narrow maritime border between a foreign country, Russia, and, on our other side, the land-boundary that we have with Canada..." Couric: "Well, explain to me why that enhances your foreign-policy credentials." Palin: "Well, it certainly does, because our, our next-door neighbors are foreign countries, there in the state that I am the executive of..." Fact: CNN: Palin Has Never Seen Russia From Alaska Couric: "Have you ever been involved in any negotiations, for example, with the Russians?" Palin: "We have trade missions back and forth, we do. It's very important when you consider even national security issues with Russia. As Putin rears his head and comes into the air space of the United States of America, where do they go? It's Alaska. It's just right over the border. It is from Alaska that we send those out to make sure that an eye is being kept on this very powerful nation, Russia, because they are right there, they are right next to our state." Air Force Lt. Gen. Dana Atkins: "The authority to launch and respond to a Russian incursion lies with the Alaska NORAD Region commander." Fact: NORAD: Sarah Palin Has No Role In Guarding U.S. Airspace
|
Author: Paulwalker
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 - 9:07 am
|
 
|
Sarah Palin: The sentence to nowhere.
|
Author: Darktemper
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 - 9:26 am
|
 
|
Got 6:49 you can spare????? Need a good laugh if your a Democrat or a good cry if your a Republican????? http://www.hulu.com/watch/36863/saturday-night-live-couric--palin-open
|
Author: Bookemdono
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 - 9:38 am
|
 
|
The funny/sad thing about that skit was Fey/Palin's answer to the $700 billion bailout question. At first glance, it looks like Tina Fey's character is just making a bunch of stuff up, but that was almost word-for-word Sarah Palin's REAL answer to Katie Couric's question. In this case, it's funny because it's true.
|
Author: Darktemper
Wednesday, October 01, 2008 - 9:51 am
|
 
|
It's funny so long as she and McCain do not get elected. Should that happen I think i'll grab my rifle and head into the wilderness. Just call me Jeremiah John.
quote:Bear Claw Chris Lapp: Can you skin Griz? Jeremiah Johnson: I can skin' em as fast as you can catch' em. [Bear Claw runs through the cabin with a huge grizzly bear close behind and jumps out the back window] Bear Claw Chris Lapp: Skin that one, pilgrim, and I'll get you another!
|