Author: Justin_timberfake
Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 7:10 pm
|
 
|
Was this a bad move on Obamas part by not having Hillary as his VP? Maybe the polls wouldn't be this close if Obama chose the Hill-meister to be his VP!
|
Author: Skeptical
Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 8:08 pm
|
 
|
We're comparing apples and oranges. Had Obama chosen Hillary, he'd be giving up some benefits that Biden brought to the table. And vice versa. They're both equally great picks. With Palin, McCain brings destruction and now, as a recent article in the NYT revealed, hatred, to the ticket. FYI, The Oregonian printed the article a few pages inside. In the NYT, it was on page A-1.
|
Author: Justin_timberfake
Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 8:14 pm
|
 
|
They're both equally great picks. I think thats your subjective opinion. What about all the women voters who are still pissed that Hillary didn't win. Think of all those angry woman voters who would have gone to Obama, that are now swayed between Mccain and Obama. I think it would have been a much smarter choice for Obama to have picked Clinton and Not Biden. I don't think the polls would have been this close if he had chosen Clinton as his VP!
|
Author: Shyguy
Sunday, September 14, 2008 - 8:27 pm
|
 
|
Could Hillary now be regrouping and preparing for a bigger move? Is it more likely that she will run against Obama in 2012? ~or Be a contender to eventually confirm a new Supreme Court Justice canidate? I am sure she has an idea about what to do its just that she has some choices.
|
Author: Skeptical
Monday, September 15, 2008 - 12:14 am
|
 
|
Think of all those angry woman voters who would have gone to Obama, that are now swayed between Mccain and Obama. I've a hunch that very few Republican women were going to vote for a flaming liberal (in their eyes) in the first place, and as for the Hillary Democrats, very few have to stomach to vote for McCain. Stay home, maybe. A vote for McCain is akin to having an eyeball gored out -- not worth it, even just to make a point.
|