Author: Radioblogman Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 2:42 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/ |
|
Author: Vitalogy Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 3:32 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Who cares? People know what's at stake and won't fall for that crap again. |
|
Author: Chickenjuggler Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 3:37 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah. " Fool me once, shame on -- shame on you. Fool me -- you can't get fooled again.' |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 3:50 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Is anybody who tries to operate outside of the the "two party system" a turd? Hypothetically speaking, if Nader were to run as a Democrat, would that make him OK, or would he still deserve opprobrium? |
|
Author: Andrew2 Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 4:00 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I'm not a registered member of any political party. But, we have a de facto 2-party system in the United States. I think we should change our system to allow effective 3rd-party candidacies. One way to do this would be to allow for a top-two run-off election if no candidate received more than 50% of the national popular vote (which currently has no meaning). Since we now have 50 state elections on election day instead of one national election, though, that would be complicated to do. |
|
Author: Herb Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 4:16 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Run Ralph, Run. |
|
Author: Skybill Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 4:23 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A 3rd party has no chance of winning and it just takes votes away from the two real parties. |
|
Author: Herb Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 4:24 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Like I say. |
|
Author: Chris_taylor Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 5:34 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Herb time for your meds. |
|
Author: Mrs_merkin Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 5:35 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
We read you the first time. |
|
Author: Missing_kskd Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 5:51 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey, send him a lot of money. Regularly! |
|
Author: Herb Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 6:01 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ralph is the anti-Perot. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 6:34 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"Somebody needs to run this man over with a Corvette." |
|
Author: Vitalogy Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 7:25 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't worry about Ralph. He's lame like two day old boxers. |
|
Author: Herb Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 8:50 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good. Then we're agreed. |
|
Author: Chickenjuggler Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 9:22 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's not really about talking about issues for you right now. It's just about making sure you are heard. Geeze, man. It's not like you haven't supported your position on abortion enough Herb. It just grinds everything to a halt. Every time you get someone's attention around here, you blow it with abortion talk every time. |
|
Author: Herb Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 9:30 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I feel your pain, Chickenjuggler. |
|
Author: Skeptical Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 10:02 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
No, you're not among good company. You're in company with buffoons. My support of pro-choice as strong as your support of anti-choice, yet you don't see me on anyone else here cramming it down your throat in post after post after post |
|
Author: Skeptical Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 10:02 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
over and over |
|
Author: Skeptical Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 10:02 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
post after post |
|
Author: Skeptical Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 10:03 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
over and over again |
|
Author: Trixter Wednesday, January 30, 2008 - 10:19 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Herb and HIS EVANGELICAL EXTREME ZELOT NUTBAGS are the reason Hilary will be elected. Thanks a lot Herb! |
|
Author: Littlesongs Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 1:24 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Author: Radioblogman Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 7:36 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Yeah, JR, I know, but with no Corvairs around, I thought a Corvette would do the job. |
|
Author: Brianl Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 7:39 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
It's a complete waste of a perfectly good Corvette though. It would shred the fiberglass body. |
|
Author: Darktemper Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 7:41 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Nah, use one of those Pinto's with the exploding gas tanks! |
|
Author: Brianl Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 7:45 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Ahhh yes. "Chariots of Fire!" |
|
Author: Littlesongs Thursday, January 31, 2008 - 8:08 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually, we could use a fellow like Ralph in the new cabinet. The Department of Transportation and Environmental Protection Agency are in need of a swift kick in the butt. |
|