Monday, December 03, 2007 - 8:09 pm
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/12/04/us/politics/04ballot.html?_r=2&hp=&oref=slogin &pagewanted=print&oref=slogin
In the NY Times, even. The left must be worried.
Herb
Monday, December 03, 2007 - 9:11 pm
Hillary doesn't need Kansas' electoral votes, so big deal.
Monday, December 03, 2007 - 9:20 pm
The troll is afraid. Very afraid.
Monday, December 03, 2007 - 10:25 pm
Its his topic and I am afraid you are the one trolling in it.
Monday, December 03, 2007 - 10:37 pm
Yes, we all know Hillary is perhaps the most polarizing candidate on the left. If she gets the nomination, red states might get redder, blue states bluer - no suprises there. But Herb will not (cannot) acknowledge that many states have shifted blue over the course of the last seven years, and that trend has accelerated with the surge not meeting it's goals, the warmongering in Iran, the AG scandals, Scooter Libby, etc.
A Hillary candidacy hurting Dems in Kansas (a perennially conservative state with only 6 EV's) ain't news. Even if it's in the NYTimes.
(Glad to see you're broadening your news sources, Herb.)
Tuesday, December 04, 2007 - 1:39 am
Mc74, perhaps the troll shouldn't derail other threads then.
Tuesday, December 04, 2007 - 7:16 am
Do unto others as you would have them do unto you!
Tuesday, December 04, 2007 - 7:17 am
"But Herb will not (cannot) acknowledge that many states have shifted blue over the course of the last seven years..."
Actually, I see an ebb and flow of voter support for both parties.
Witness Mr. Bush's 31% +/- approval and the congress at 11%. Neither is extremely popular right now.
If democrats and republicans keep partisan bickering going, we're going to see another Ralph Nader or Ross Perot.
Herb
Tuesday, December 04, 2007 - 7:20 am
I hope so!
But, I sorta like this guy:
Tom Tancredo
http://teamtancredo.org/
