Author: Adiant Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 12:16 pm |
|
Reading about KFBK Sacramento for another thread, I realize that I don't understand why they, and so many other clear channel stations, EVER had to have a directional pattern in the daytime. |
|
Author: Notalent Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 3:51 pm |
|
Possibly to put a stronger signal into a desired area... or less signal in an unpopulated area. |
|
Author: Dan_mullin Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 4:20 pm |
|
I remember back in the day KPNW had a chance to go non-directional but it would have taken a different tower array (read more money) At the time Charlie Wilson said no way and stayed directional 50kw...lucky to hit 52nd street in Springfield to the east. They protect another station in St Louis (KMOX?). |
|
Author: Radiogiant Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 6:04 pm |
|
How are things going Dan ?? Any leads on jobs ? |
|
Author: Dan_mullin Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 8:05 pm |
|
not too bad..kickin back a bit..got a few things in the works..not quite ready for retirement yet. still wake up at 3:45 every morning. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 8:32 pm |
|
The clears above 1500 were Class 1B. As such, they tended to not have the full protection of a 1A such as KFI. |
|
Author: Kent_randles Sunday, November 18, 2007 - 10:18 pm |
|
Since KFBK's primary market is Sacramento, why waste signal where there are no listeners or Arbitron diaries? |
|