Author: Chickenjuggler Monday, October 15, 2007 - 3:34 pm |
|
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20071015/ap_on_sc/gay_genetics |
|
Author: Deane_johnson Monday, October 15, 2007 - 3:36 pm |
|
Sounds like something out of the 1930's. |
|
Author: Chickenjuggler Monday, October 15, 2007 - 3:37 pm |
|
Oh yeah - totally. |
|
Author: Chris_taylor Monday, October 15, 2007 - 5:23 pm |
|
I was talking to long time music producer friend recently and I asked him who he's working with these days. He mentioned a woman whose music I was familiar with and when he didn't mention her husband I asked and he said they had divorced because he had fallen in love with another man. |
|
Author: Brianl Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 6:32 am |
|
An evangelical Christian "using science" determines that gay people CHOOSE to be gay and can be converted to being straight, "without harm." |
|
Author: Edselehr Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 7:38 am |
|
Wow Chris, you are describing exactly the situation between two good friends of mine; both strongly involved in music and their church, with two children. She too left him because of his gay lifestyle, which they had kept hidden throughout their children's upbringing. I don't think we are talking about the same people, but it goes to show that these stories are unusually common. |
|
Author: Trixter Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 9:10 am |
|
Cue the Southern accent: It's like GAY is a disease!!!!! |
|
Author: Chris_taylor Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 2:07 pm |
|
Edselehr- |
|
Author: Andrew2 Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 2:23 pm |
|
It's definitely possible to "behave straight" if you are gay. It's also a prescription, for most gay people, for being miserable. You can choose to be miserable, there's no doubt about that. Fundamentalists don't care; it's all about their beliefs. Better to be a miserable straight-living gay person and following the moral code than a happy gay person behaving immorally. |
|
Author: Chris_taylor Tuesday, October 16, 2007 - 3:25 pm |
|
Andrew-You just pretty much summerized Mel White's book (The Iran comment excluded). |
|
Author: Chickenjuggler Saturday, October 20, 2007 - 12:22 am |
|
Well I would have been interested in someone's take had they actually looked at the article. I guess headlines and snippet are all we need, eh? |
|