Author: Radioxpert Monday, June 18, 2007 - 7:52 pm |
|
There's a new crackly mess of (K-Love) RF crap originating from Buck Mountain at 107.3! This crackly mess is spilling out over 107.5, illegally blocking out KVMX. Let's get this malfunctioning translator pulled off the air! |
|
Author: Itsvern Monday, June 18, 2007 - 8:02 pm |
|
Tell the FCC!! |
|
Author: Chris_taylor Monday, June 18, 2007 - 8:55 pm |
|
Well you could contact K-love and let them know what's happening and have their engineers take a listen. Possibly a little tweak will do the job. |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, June 18, 2007 - 10:37 pm |
|
Where is Buck Mountain? It must be somewhere that doesn't also interfere with K-Love on 107.1. If it creates some interference now, it will probably have to be moved when KVMX increases power because it will no longer be legal. |
|
Author: Newflyer Monday, June 18, 2007 - 10:59 pm |
|
I'm guessing it's K297AJ, licensed to Coburg: |
|
Author: Radioxpert Tuesday, June 19, 2007 - 12:50 am |
|
Yes, this RF mess appears to be K-Love's K297AJ, Coburg. The signal is so unclear, it's unlistenable. The mess also spills over 107.1 KLVU, just north of Eugene. |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, June 19, 2007 - 2:32 am |
|
If that's where it is, I don't really see the problem with KVMX although K-Love seems a little close. KBPS coexists with KLCC as does KNRK with KMGE and these stations run a lot more power. |
|
Author: Dodger Tuesday, June 19, 2007 - 11:05 am |
|
can you say NERD. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Tuesday, June 19, 2007 - 1:28 pm |
|
Radio nerds don't let stations get away with this kind of crap. |
|
Author: Dodger Tuesday, June 19, 2007 - 4:19 pm |
|
Radio nerds must not have lives, loves, or occupations either. |
|
Author: Yahmit Thursday, June 21, 2007 - 6:37 am |
|
FCC rules state that if a translator is blocking the signal of a radio station, the translator has to be removed. A couple years back, a translator at 105.5 was installed in Salem and it blocked Bob FM out of Eugene. A letter complaining to the FCC caused the translator to be removed. |
|
Author: Broadway Thursday, June 21, 2007 - 6:50 am |
|
In fact it only has to be only one person that can shut it down. That person in Salem happened to be a lawyer that could no longer listen to Bob FM. Is one person too much power in shutting down a translator that was ok'd by the FCC? Kind of a head scratcher... |
|
Author: Darktemper Thursday, June 21, 2007 - 7:03 am |
|
Well you know....if you guys in Radio don't want to sound like "DONALD DUCK ON HELIUM" over the air.....then you might consider being nicer to these technical radio professionals! The world will go around by itself but that little blue globe in your interent explorer sure wont without Techie's! They can also destroy every file on your PC's simply by leaving you alone with it for a long weekend! |
|
Author: Radioxpert Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 11:10 pm |
|
Has anyone else contacted the FCC about this nasty interference? |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Friday, June 29, 2007 - 10:30 am |
|
> If I had the time to find out whether some station |
|
Author: Outsider Friday, June 29, 2007 - 12:34 pm |
|
Author: Radioxpert |
|
Author: Oldbroadcaster Friday, June 29, 2007 - 6:00 pm |
|
Outsider: |
|
Author: Bob Saturday, June 30, 2007 - 12:19 pm |
|
Blocking 107.5 is a good thing... |
|
Author: Radioxpert Sunday, July 01, 2007 - 1:13 am |
|
It's not good for those who wish to listen in the southern part of the valley. |
|
Author: Newflyer Sunday, July 01, 2007 - 10:39 pm |
|
It might not currently run a format you personally like, but maybe later the station changes to something you do want to listen to, but can't because of said translators. |
|
Author: Notalent Monday, July 02, 2007 - 6:52 am |
|
Translator operators know going in that they can be turned off if they interfere with a licensed station. They are taking the chance that nobody will care enough to WRITE A LETTER TO THE FCC. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, July 02, 2007 - 2:34 pm |
|
Notalent is 100% correct! |
|
Author: Newflyer Monday, July 02, 2007 - 11:47 pm |
|
Notalent is 100% correct! |
|
Author: Dodger Tuesday, July 03, 2007 - 9:54 am |
|
or care I might add |
|
Author: Outsider Tuesday, July 03, 2007 - 12:08 pm |
|
Author: Oldbroadcaster |
|
Author: Beano Tuesday, July 03, 2007 - 4:25 pm |
|
You do know that Radioxpert is Dan packard, right Outsider???? |
|
Author: Craig_adams Tuesday, July 03, 2007 - 9:06 pm |
|
No, Dan is not Radioxpert. When Radioxpert began on pdxradio, he was asking a lot of questions and starting threads as often as DJfrresh. Then he settled down after his questions were answered. I remember a lot of those questions were things we had discussed earlier. Dan would've read those posts and wouldn't ask questions already answered. |
|
Author: Notalent Tuesday, July 03, 2007 - 9:45 pm |
|
NO, he needs to WRITE the FCC, a call will not be sufficient. It must be a written complaint. |
|
Author: Jeffreykopp Thursday, July 05, 2007 - 9:47 pm |
|
The old hands here know that being an experienced, diligent moderator, Dan feels it best to post infrequently, and posts under his own name. |
|
Author: Beano Thursday, July 05, 2007 - 11:17 pm |
|
Craig I disagree with you on that. Im 95% sure Dan is Radioxpert. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Friday, July 06, 2007 - 2:10 am |
|
Beano: How do you know Dan & Radioxpert have the same opinions "feelings, irritations"? |
|
Author: Oldbroadcaster Friday, July 06, 2007 - 1:09 pm |
|
I'm 100 per cent sure Dodger is NOT Dan. |
|
Author: Newflyer Friday, July 06, 2007 - 6:39 pm |
|
I thought I remember Radioxpert mentioning quite a long time ago that he was a Eugene programmer/DJ that used to have a Saturday night show on 92V, and more recently has/had something to do with a station in Oakridge. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, July 06, 2007 - 10:31 pm |
|
I'm not Dan but I am Craig. Craig is Dan, no wait! |
|
Author: Dberichon Sunday, July 08, 2007 - 4:39 pm |
|
Dan Packard posts as "Dan Packard" as I recall. |
|
Author: Beano Sunday, July 08, 2007 - 6:54 pm |
|
So your saying he ONLY has one Screen name Dberichon???? I THINK NOT! |
|
Author: Randy_in_eugene Sunday, July 08, 2007 - 9:05 pm |
|
The poster named "62kgw" isn't the true Super 62 KGW at all. |
|
Author: Mrs_merkin Sunday, July 08, 2007 - 11:24 pm |
|
Yeah, I was wondering that as well! We go waaay back... |
|
Author: Dan_packard Sunday, July 15, 2007 - 1:50 pm |
|
I'm no expert. That's for sure. I wish I had more time to post - but barely enough time to read. You can usually tell posters that masquerade under a different name by spotting similar phrases or sentence structure. Each post used to show its ip address, which gave some insight. Now they show just on internal logs. |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Sunday, July 15, 2007 - 2:24 pm |
|
The FCC does allow a translator to block out the signal of a station. |
|
Author: Radiorat Sunday, September 23, 2007 - 11:57 am |
|
i think this station is now movin. |
|