Author: Motozak
Monday, February 05, 2007 - 2:06 pm
|
|
So, the "Ionic PaxNet" still seems to be the same 15 hours of Infomercials in the daytime and only a few hours of classic TV at night......... Where's all this wonderful old programming Lowell Paxson himself promised us in his 1/2 hour taped promo just as "PaxNet" was barely getting started almost 10 years ago? (Did see Smokey and the Bandit on there a few weeks ago tho....then went to a neighbour's place the Monday following and borrowed his Laserdisc of it.....) Why don't they just throw in the towel and just admit that their network is a flop, instead of throwing more money away with it? All re-naming it will do is just give it a new name.....won't do anything to improve the programming!!
|
Author: Trixter
Monday, February 05, 2007 - 2:40 pm
|
|
Laserdisc? WOW! ROVS "Reflective Optical Videodisc System" First LaserDisc (DiscoVision) title marketed in North America??? Jaws 78' The last two titles released in North America were Paramount's Sleepy Hollow and Bringing Out the Dead in 2000.
|
Author: Motozak
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 12:49 pm
|
|
I don't have any Discovision titles but I am always looking!! (Mainly in this case, for novelty/collector value, not necessarily picture quality.........)
|
Author: Larrybudmelman
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 1:30 pm
|
|
There are 3 digital channels broadcast by Ion in Portland. Over the air, 32.1 is old series and movies a la Nick at Nite. 32.2 is Qubo, a largely animated and children's network. 32.3 is primarily infomercials and a few of the aforementioned old TV series.
|
Author: Larrybudmelman
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 2:48 pm
|
|
...er, those should be 22.1, 22.2, and 22.3, respectively...sorry for my inaccuracy.
|
Author: Dberichon
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 3:33 pm
|
|
Did they kill their 4th channel? At one point they had been broadcasting 4 channels.
|
Author: Jr_tech
Tuesday, February 06, 2007 - 3:40 pm
|
|
Nope... just checked, 22.4 = Worship
|
Author: Motozak
Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 11:48 am
|
|
So basically 22.3 is merely a simulcast of the programming currently showing on analogue 22/54, right? I need to get a new OTA convertor anyways, might even enjoy the "Nick at Night" takeoff. And I miss The Tube! Slightly off-topic, but-- Isn't the case true with DTV that the more multicasts you put on a channel, the lower the quality gets because your bandwidth is being limited? Kinda like the major problem plaguing Ibiquity's FM system only this time around on TV? I remember seeing, at my Aunt's place TBN having five multichannels (not that I ever *watch* TBN aside from trying to tune my antenna!) and the quality of some of those subs really wasn't anything to write home about. (But she also uses Direct-TV, so this might be like what apples are, compared to oranges........)
|
Author: Omega3
Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 11:51 am
|
|
Another out of place thread? Come on guys, move this crap to the other side.
|
Author: Motozak
Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 11:55 am
|
|
Omega-- Do you watch television? Isn't TV technology another type of radio?? Isn't this a board about RADIO?? Methinx it izz............
|
Author: Omega3
Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 12:02 pm
|
|
I'm pretty sure this topic has come up in the past and it was decided that TV talk belongs somewhere else...
|
Author: Mrs_merkin
Saturday, February 17, 2007 - 8:25 pm
|
|
May I suggest the obvious? Avoid opening and posting on any threads that have a TV subject line. Everytime you post to complain, they of course go right back up to the top. You could email Dan privately if they're bumming your high that much. Just my .0002
|
Author: Drchaps
Sunday, February 18, 2007 - 7:12 pm
|
|
Hey... ION is normal on 22.1, which is what we all see on 22/54 on the analog side. 22.2 is QUBO, an all kids network. 22.3 is ION Life (Beginning tomorrow 2-19-07). This used to be the east coast feed of ION, so nothing to gain except to see growing pains at 5 instead of 8. 22.4 is Worship. I think ION is realizing that there is a market for retro tv 24 hours a day and 22.1 will eventually transition to that. What I am curious about is adoption of the other channels by the cable companies. I hope ION Life takes on a discovery channel personality of its own.
|
Author: Motozak
Monday, February 19, 2007 - 4:43 pm
|
|
"I think ION is realizing that there is a market for retro tv 24 hours a day and 22.1 will eventually transition to that." I certainly hope so. 'Bout time. Ten years of infomercials, and (just a wild guess) poor ratings should be enough for ANY network to realise the need for, what....TV!! I mean, seriously.........How many times a day do I need to see Al Borland trying desperately to plug his "Little Giant Ladder System" when we all know what he's *really* trying to do is re-live his Binford days? Jeez, what a Tool.......... *snickers* So apparently what you've mentioned with the Ion Life thing starting in the future.....they give the channels their network name even before they start broadcasting its actual programming? Sounds kind-of like what I was seeing way back in Dish Net days, before I went FTA. (Hey hey, what can I say? My OTA convertor box fell victim to a nasty power surge a coupla years ago, and haven't gotten a new one....yet........)
|
Author: Semoochie
Monday, February 19, 2007 - 5:52 pm
|
|
This is the first time I've heard of a network changing names before anyone knew what the old one was called! It sort of reminds me of the "Magnavox Decision": Oh, just kidding.
|
Author: Motozak
Monday, February 19, 2007 - 6:16 pm
|
|
Whuuhhhh????
|
Author: Motozak
Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 12:24 pm
|
|
No, seriously--what do you mean by the "Magnavox Decision"? Was this something to do with their merger with Philips a number of years ago, or what?
|
Author: Semoochie
Tuesday, February 20, 2007 - 2:18 pm
|
|
In 1980, the FCC chose Magnavox as the approved system for AM stereo. Soonafter, there were claims of "pops and ticks" and certain people threatened to sue. The FCC quickly backed down and after a 2 year delay, "decided not to decide" and went with the "marketplace decision" instead. In retrospect, if the FCC had stayed with the original decision at a time when AM still enjoyed nearly half of the radio audience, it may have encouraged receiver manufacturers to make better sounding AM radios when there was still plenty of music on the band and 2nd and 3rd generation improvements to the Magnavox system would probably have solved the "pops and ticks" problem or greatly reduced it.
|