Author: Andy_brown Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 12:24 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I think the Republicans. The religious conservatives were already getting beat up by the Bush administration's failure to deliver all their bible thumping agenda items. The fiscal conservatives (which includes many Democrats) were already losing as a result of the spending recklessness of the Bush administration. |
|
Author: Joamon4sure Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 12:52 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
AMERICA as a whole is the loser. Interest rates, inflation, and bullshit are all going to go through the roof in a hurry. Gonna tak forever to dig out from under this crapheap when it's ran it's course. Guess it's gonna be Hillary's turn to screw around in the oral office this time! LOL |
|
Author: Joamon4sure Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 12:53 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Oooops. Sorry bought that typo there! |
|
Author: Reinstatepete Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 1:14 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The religious right is the BIG loser here, but America as a whole is the winner. It will take time to right the ship, but with some checks and balances now in place, that we've lacked the last 6 years, there's at least hope of an honest debate, rather than one party ramming everything through. |
|
Author: Andrew2 Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 1:31 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I do fear Democrats will get blamed for the mess Bush has created in the last few years but which hasn't quite become obvious yet. Iraq is obvious but the huge budget deficit barely makes news if ever. Defeated Republicans keep talking about how Pelosi and Reid will raise taxes to pay for new spending, seemingly endorsing the idea of BORROWING to pay for new spending the way they have the last six years - WTF? Why is borrowing against our grandchildren's paychecks acceptable but paying for it now is so contemptible? |
|
Author: Eastsideguy Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 1:50 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Wakeup call for Joamon4sure! |
|
Author: Reinstatepete Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 2:14 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Actually, one could say that Rush Limbaugh personally lost the Senate for the GOP with his reaction to the Michael J. Fox ad. Had Rush not made a mockery, perhaps Talent would have held his seat? |
|
Author: Andrew2 Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 2:44 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bingo, Reinstatepete. At very least, Talent's race would have been closer. It's amazing how seemingly innocuous, sometimes off-the-cuff, careless remarks can have such a huge impact. It now seems almost certain that had George Allen not uttered the famous "Mucacha" insult - which opened up a can of worms - he would have won Virgina and kept the Senate Republican. And Allen's quip drew so much attention that it reflected negatively on other Republicans and took valuable airtime that could have been filled by Republican spin. Rush's quip about Fox probably was less significant in the Missouri race, given that McCaskill beat Talent by 41,000 votes. |
|
Author: Joamon4sure Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 3:30 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
By Eastsideguy on Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 1:50 pm: |
|
Author: Skeptical Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 3:58 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
"I just thank GOD that John Kerry was not in office when 9-11 happened. I don't think Kerry would have did the right thing" |
|
Author: Reinstatepete Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 4:02 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
John Kerry most likely would NOT have attacked Iraq, a country that had nothing to do with us getting attacked on 9/11. Just think of all the troops that would still be alive to raise their families had we had someone other than a warmonger at the helm. I wish we had had anyone other than Bush in charge, because we would be better off today, no doubt about it. Bush's war in Iraq will go down as one of the most disasterous decisions ever made by a US President. |
|
Author: Andrew2 Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 4:24 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Why didn't Bush attack Mexico after 9/11? After all, we were attacked, so why not go after them? |
|
Author: Waynes_world Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 4:56 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
By Joamon4sure on Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 12:52 pm: |
|
Author: Reinstatepete Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 6:00 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
George Allen, Katherine Harris, Jim Talent, and Rick Santorum are liberals? |
|
Author: Joamon4sure Thursday, November 09, 2006 - 6:02 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey Skep....I never said I agreed with the entire Bush campaign and when you post a section of another it should be the whole thing: |
|
Author: Sohran Friday, November 10, 2006 - 12:32 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Conservatives won in one aspect. The pork was getting out of control. Not that the dems will limit much of it, but it is a lot easier to say no to the other team, then when everybody is on the same team. i.e. no vetos when the president and congress are on the same side. The president should have vetoed a lot more of the pork that got passed. |
|
Author: Andy_brown Friday, November 10, 2006 - 1:27 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Good point. In the sense of oversight that is exactly correct. As far as moving forward in several items in the agenda it is also correct. I think the conservatives as a whole lost a lot of power, but the entire GOP agenda has to suffer, and indeed it should. |
|
Author: Reinstatepete Friday, November 10, 2006 - 1:41 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Pork? Are you talking about the billions that went to defense and big oil courtesy of those same conservatives? |
|
Author: Sohran Friday, November 10, 2006 - 3:05 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This election was a victory for Iran. |
|
Author: Andrew2 Friday, November 10, 2006 - 3:15 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Victory for Iran? Are you kidding? What American president in the last 50 years has done so much for Iran as George W. Bush? Shoot, he took out hated regimes on both sides of Iran: both Saddam Hussein and the Taliban were mortal enemies of Iran. In addition, by adding Iran to the "Axis of Evil," Bush gave their leader an excuse to rally around him and consolidate his domestic power. |
|
Author: Cochise Friday, November 10, 2006 - 4:12 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey I'm sure the Terrorist in Iraq are happy. |
|
Author: Andrew2 Friday, November 10, 2006 - 5:04 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The terrorists (al Qaeda and foreign jihadists) in Iraq definitely want America to stay in Iraq, so they can continue to attack us there. They are looking for every opportunity to humiliate and attack America, no matter which party is in charge. They would love it if Bush could stay in office indefinitely. But they will cheer any preceived United States defeat. |
|
Author: Skeptical Friday, November 10, 2006 - 6:29 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
good point andrew, if we weren't in iraq, they'd have to find other ways to "attack" us, like Isreal (or France! |
|
Author: Trixter Saturday, November 11, 2006 - 9:49 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Toecheese and Sorehand are just sore losers..... |
|
Author: Trixter Saturday, November 11, 2006 - 12:18 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I love Wayner saying that the neo-CONers that lost were Liberals? WTF is that S all about??? Wayner is a sore ass loser too! |
|
Author: Brianl Saturday, November 11, 2006 - 3:07 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Trix - he just doesn't get it. Those of us who are registered Republicans with a brain .. and AREN'T afraid to use it ... are just sore-loser liberals, bleeding hearts who simply want to do nothing more than make every single sin available legal, the terrorists to win, for Christians to all be burned at the stake ... you get the drill. Since we're not a conservative in the mold of Wayne and his ilk, we are LIBERALS! It's like we are lepers, or AIDS patients, or something. Y'know, things the Christians want to shove under the rug, into the closet. |
|
Author: Sohran Sunday, November 12, 2006 - 10:48 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061110/pl_nm/usa_elections_iran_dc |
|
Author: Trixter Sunday, November 12, 2006 - 11:51 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Brian said>>> |
|
Author: Andrew2 Sunday, November 12, 2006 - 12:53 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Of course Iran wants Americans to go home, not stay indefinitely. They are thrilled that America and Bush knocked over Saddam Hussein for them, but like a dinner guest who has long overstayed his welcome, they want the US to get out. Any humiliation of the man who called them part of the "Axis of Evil" would be celebrated in Iran, despite the great things Bush has done for them. |
|