Author: Semoochie Saturday, September 09, 2006 - 11:35 pm |
|
KFIR 720 Sweet Home now has a construction permit for 10kw from its present site. We should be able to hear it up here. |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Monday, September 11, 2006 - 4:04 pm |
|
Semoochie, I started a thread called "Can a signal upgrade be too expensive?" |
|
Author: Albordj Monday, September 11, 2006 - 7:08 pm |
|
With 184 watts wouldn't that at least reach Lebanon and Albany on the fringe at night? Perhaps with 10KW daytime a change will be on the horizon for KFIR. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, September 11, 2006 - 7:35 pm |
|
With 720 KDWN booming in at night, KFIR couldn't easily be heard outside of the Sweet Home area. |
|
Author: Fm123 Monday, September 11, 2006 - 8:38 pm |
|
Why do they keep on placing these local AM stations on clear-channel frequencies, then plan on bumping up the power after a few years? This makes no sense at all to me. These 50KW giants will still wipe them out! |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, September 11, 2006 - 9:22 pm |
|
This is a situation where a 1kw daytimer on 1370 moved to 720. It's a pretty good deal, especially now that it will be 10kw! They didn't ask for nighttime power. The Daytime Broadcasters Association convinced the FCC it was a good idea. |
|
Author: Randy_in_eugene Monday, September 11, 2006 - 10:16 pm |
|
I can't see the 10 kw as much of a benefit if the station is still essentially a daytimer outside of Sweet Home. |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, September 11, 2006 - 10:44 pm |
|
The station barely made it to Corvallis before and now will clear Salem. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Tuesday, September 12, 2006 - 12:23 am |
|
KFIR could act as a daytimer for Eugene. |
|
Author: Broadway Tuesday, September 12, 2006 - 5:30 am |
|
Without at decent tower (ground system) and processing, coverage will not be that great in Salem and Eugene. |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Monday, September 18, 2006 - 12:50 pm |
|
I just notice today? The KGW has cut back there noon news to a half hour. Instead of a full hour, that they have been doing for many years. |
|
Author: Notalent Monday, September 18, 2006 - 2:32 pm |
|
and that has what to do with towers and such? |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Monday, September 18, 2006 - 5:09 pm |
|
I like to listen to KYTE (102.7),a Newport station |
|
Author: E_dawg Monday, September 18, 2006 - 8:54 pm |
|
Could someone tell me what is going on with the move in 97.7 The Dalles into 97.9 Tualitin? Also, is FAA clear with the 97.9 moving to 107.9 frequency? |
|
Author: Craig_adams Friday, September 22, 2006 - 7:07 pm |
|
bump |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, September 22, 2006 - 10:04 pm |
|
I'd like to apologize for starting this thread prematurely. Someone mentioned the other one was gone and I couldn't find it. Now, I see it again. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Friday, September 22, 2006 - 10:38 pm |
|
Semoochie: I'm glad you did! The one I started 11 months ago is getting really show to load now. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 1:23 am |
|
"Could someone tell me what is going on with the move in 97.7 The Dalles into 97.9 Tualitin? Also, is FAA clear with the 97.9 moving to 107.9 frequency?" |
|
Author: Radioxpert Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 1:25 am |
|
"Is K-103 still planing to broadcast in Salem at 102.7?" |
|
Author: Semoochie Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 4:47 pm |
|
I thought I responded to this question once but don't see my reply anymore. As far as I can tell, the plan to move KACI to Tualatin on 97.9 is in the very early stages. It doesn't appear to have even been proposed yet by the FCC. I think this means that they either haven't decided yet to make the proposal or are waiting for something to occur. That occurance could be finalizing the move from The Dalles to the Seattle area et al. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 9:07 pm |
|
Yes...I wonder how many years it'll take for 104.5 to make it's move. |
|
Author: Billboise Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 10:31 pm |
|
1.IT IS ORDERED, That effective October 20, 2006, the FM Table of Allotments, 47 C.F.R. Section 73.202(b), IS AMENDED, with respect to the communities listed below, to read as follows: |
|
Author: Semoochie Saturday, September 23, 2006 - 11:06 pm |
|
If that's the case then expect KXPC to be sold in the near future. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Sunday, September 24, 2006 - 1:07 am |
|
The FAA won't allow KNRQ to move to 107.9? So...Marathon Media's KXPC move isn't going to happen? |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Sunday, September 24, 2006 - 3:40 am |
|
Not to long ago. KVMX 107.5 had an application on file with the FCC. To boost there power to 100kw. Does this mean KVMX and KNRQ move to 107.9 on the dail. Will not work at all at the higher end of the FM band. |
|
Author: Fm123 Sunday, September 24, 2006 - 9:25 am |
|
Just because the aircraft band is located between 108-136 MHz, it does not mean that an FM station at 107.9 will interfere with the operations of the airport communications. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, September 24, 2006 - 9:59 am |
|
KVMX has a construction permit for 100kw from their present location. I don't believe they have anything to do with this. |
|
Author: 62kgw Sunday, September 24, 2006 - 10:51 am |
|
I read somewhere that if a 107.9 tries HD, the HD fuzz extends into the aircraft band! |
|
Author: Andy_brown Sunday, September 24, 2006 - 1:09 pm |
|
The FCC only recognizes the authority of the FAA with issues pertaining to tower construction. When constructing a new service on an existing tower, FAA notification is not required in the eyes of the FCC. The FAA thinks otherwise. The FAA has it's own interference models that must be observed when you apply to construct a new tower, and the established way to circumvent this problem is to reduce power to the FAA limit, get their OK, build it, then upply for a power upgrade and since the FAA has approved the tower, you don't have to notify them that you are upping power. |
|
Author: Blackwhite Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 11:09 pm |
|
Interesting how a no nothing community like The Dalles Oregon could have two stations that are being moved into bigger markets. KMCQ to Seattle and KACI to Portland. What does that leave The Dalles for stations... I mean formats. They probably have enough stations. Any my gosh, these posts have indeed been talking about KMCQ and wondering if they will move. And as for the KACI thing, that is relatively new... at least for the posts. Most move-ins in the rest of the country have been completed in less than 3 years. Facinating how much money a station might be worth in Portland, not The Dalles! What's your guess???? |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, October 01, 2006 - 11:51 pm |
|
The Dalles has 2 AMs and 3 FMs. In addition, a strong signal can be heard from an FM in Goldendale, which has it's antenna just about exactly halfway between Goldendale and The Dalles. It covered the latter pretty well when it was a Class A. Now it's a C2! There's also a construction permit for the Hood River FM that could hit fairly well. |
|
Author: Andy_brown Monday, October 02, 2006 - 1:18 pm |
|
"Interesting how a no nothing community like The Dalles Oregon could have two stations that are being moved into bigger markets." |
|
Author: Billboise Monday, October 02, 2006 - 7:37 pm |
|
KMCQ was about the only thing I could hear all the way from Madris to The Dalles, even down in Maupin. |
|
Author: Missing_kskd Monday, October 02, 2006 - 11:22 pm |
|
Andy, hope you are right. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Tuesday, October 17, 2006 - 4:38 am |
|
KBND Bend is expanding to Television. KBND-LP channel 41. |
|
Author: Jeffreykopp Friday, October 20, 2006 - 4:12 am |
|
I appreciate Andy's analysis, as it shed light on a corner I'd overlooked. While I'd shared in the hope I've seen expressed that the overacquistion is now resulting in a sell-off from which some genuinely local service might revive in the shake-out, I hadn't yet grasped the overall scheme: i.e., the systematic shuffle of service grades (a bit too arcane here in Towers & Such for me to fully comprehend), which I now see as effectively a theft of media bandwidth from smaller communities by transferring it to overcrowded urban markets, worsening the viability of stations there, necessitating the outsourcing of their content. |
|
Author: Tadc Friday, October 20, 2006 - 12:40 pm |
|
Kopp- I, for one, am interested to hear the extended version of the rant. |
|
Author: Andy_brown Friday, October 20, 2006 - 3:29 pm |
|
"theft of media bandwidth from smaller communities by transferring it to overcrowded urban markets, worsening the viability of stations there, " |
|
Author: Albordj Friday, October 20, 2006 - 4:59 pm |
|
A question for Andy...is there something that's happened in Albany, Corvallis that I'm not aware of?...If you are speaking of the move of KFLY to Eugene, while still licensed to Corvallis, what it's done is expanded the listenable area and has allowed Clear Channel to increase it's revenue....the last I knew the United States allowed business to do that in a free market economy...and the last I knew KLOO AM/FM and KRKT, and KTTH haven't seen any reduction in power and are doing just fine...can you clarify that situation? I am also wondering if CC has "dumped" any stations here in the Northwest? Fact is I couldn't find, after a bit of research, that CC is selling off the smaller stations...I also must comment on the "so along comes the next fool who doesn't know this history"...if that's the case, shame on the prospective buyer on not doing his or her homework...or would that be like someone buying a home near the airport and complaining about the noise? Just curious! |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, October 20, 2006 - 5:06 pm |
|
Clear Channel has been known for buying smaller market stations and moving them into neighboring larger markets. KFLY and KNBQ are two NW examples. |
|
Author: Rongallagher Friday, October 20, 2006 - 6:10 pm |
|
A good two-word example of what Andy writes about: Entercom Longview. |
|
Author: Notalent Friday, October 20, 2006 - 6:22 pm |
|
Andy is sounding a little bitter there. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, October 20, 2006 - 8:01 pm |
|
Entercom "trashed" the 94.5 signal in Longview/Kelso, to clear the way for Portland's 94.7 to move to a much better site. In the end, it was well worth it, since 94.7 (KNRK) deserves full coverage of the Portland metro. |
|
Author: Albordj Friday, October 20, 2006 - 8:04 pm |
|
Radioxpert you bring up a good point about KFLY and KNBQ, however the moves haven't caused the smaller markets to suffer, in fact CC actually put a country station back on in Centralia with the same calls it had before KMNT. As I mentioned in my last post, KFLY is still licensed to Corvallis and is still city grade in Corvallis, and frankly Sarge has done a good job in making KFLY a highly rated station...and the harm is?????? |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, October 20, 2006 - 8:18 pm |
|
Clear Channel was very smart to move KFLY (Corvallis) and KNBQ (Centralia) into larger markets. Both of these stations significantly increased their coverage, while keeping their original cities of license. Job well done! |
|
Author: Notalent Friday, October 20, 2006 - 8:29 pm |
|
As I've said here before, whatever you think of them, large group owners like CC have spent more money improving the technical (and legal) aspects of many stations that were in sad conditions under previous private owners. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, October 20, 2006 - 8:57 pm |
|
I think they're both C2s. Besides the Goldendale station, the one in Hood River is moving its antenna to better reach The Dalles. |
|
Author: Rongallagher Friday, October 20, 2006 - 11:22 pm |
|
Have to agree with your post Notalent. Entercom dropped some serious (for Longview) money on the physical plant during their years there. That included some new transmitters, an on-channel booster for KRQT (good move), and lots of new studio gear. But KLYK is practically unlistenable on the west side of Longview, even with a translator. Maybe Bicostal will fix the problem someday. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, October 20, 2006 - 11:45 pm |
|
92.7 KMSW is a C3 and 97.7 KACI-FM is (just barely) a C2...and they cover The Dalles, flawlessly. KMSW has translator (102.9) in Hood River. Hood River's 105.5 KCGB currently has no coverage in The Dalles, but will have a little bit, once it moves. The class C; 104.5 KMCQ "Q104" is the market's only full-time local voice. |
|
Author: Jeffreykopp Friday, October 20, 2006 - 11:57 pm |
|
Notalent also makes a good point, and the bit about "small time rich" does indeed ring home. I don't know enough myself to have an opinion on CC as an entity; besides its vocal critics, it also has plausible defenders who report welcoming the improved salaries and facilities. |
|
Author: Andy_brown Sunday, October 22, 2006 - 3:28 pm |
|
Notalent: "I don't for one minute buy that radio was so much better off being run by the small time rich rather than the big time rich. |
|
Author: Notalent Sunday, October 22, 2006 - 6:20 pm |
|
I worked for Vic Ives in the 80's. is that small time rich or eccentric enough for ya??? I also worked for Don McCoun briefly... Today Taft/Nationwide would be considered small time too. |
|
Author: Jeffreykopp Friday, November 10, 2006 - 1:37 am |
|
KMIH/KMCQ: Footnote/postscript to the big shuffle: |
|
Author: Ptaak Friday, November 10, 2006 - 2:08 am |
|
In response to Notalent |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Wednesday, November 29, 2006 - 8:42 pm |
|
I just read a report today. That said public television station KSPS ch 7 in Spokane. Is currently off the air. The station lost top 200 feet of it's broadcast tower. There web site has pictures of the collapsed tower. Looks likes ice damage got to it. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Monday, December 04, 2006 - 11:41 am |
|
last night I noticed that KKCW (103.3) HD digital was off the air... the HD is still off as I write, anybody know whats going on? |
|
Author: Blackwhite Tuesday, December 05, 2006 - 10:11 pm |
|
Rumor is that the move in thing is happening in The Dalles, is that with KACI or KMCQ? |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, December 05, 2006 - 11:31 pm |
|
KMCQ is moving to Covington WA. They're attempting to move KACI to Tualatin but there seems to be a stall. |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Wednesday, December 06, 2006 - 5:16 pm |
|
As the year is coming to an end. Two of our local broadcast stations. Are coming up on some big milestones. First KXL-AM has been on the air for 80 years. And KGW-TV will be turning 50 years old soon. |
|
Author: Paulwarren Thursday, December 07, 2006 - 2:25 am |
|
I think the loss of the "show" from show business in radio has little to do with dereg. I think that happened when researchers convinced management that they could produce a more consistent business model by turning an art form into "paint by numbers". |
|
Author: Field_strength Thursday, December 07, 2006 - 8:44 am |
|
KMCQ is moving to the Seattle market April 1. |
|
Author: Kjunguy Thursday, December 07, 2006 - 3:18 pm |
|
Hmmmm. April fools day. |
|
Author: E_dawg Monday, December 11, 2006 - 10:25 pm |
|
How about the 97.9 move-in to Portland. When will this take place? |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, December 12, 2006 - 12:48 am |
|
Earlier in this thread, there was a brief discussion of KNRQ 97.9 being blocked by the FAA from moving to 107.9. This could slow or prevent a move into Tualatin. I don't expect anything to happen up here until this problem is solved. |
|
Author: E_dawg Tuesday, December 12, 2006 - 6:09 pm |
|
How about 96.3 move to Portland from Warm Springs (96.5) or 102.7 move to Portland from Newport. (Wishful thinking) |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, December 12, 2006 - 11:29 pm |
|
Biggest problem is Olympia on 96.1. They aren't likely to give up any coverage of Seattle. Moving 102.7 to Portland would force K103 to 103.5 which in turn would force the Fish to 104.3. Even if you moved everyone else, stations in Portland and Seattle would probably not be willing to give up coverage and at least one of them would have to drop to a Class C0. If there is ever a time when there are no analog signals, it could probably happen without adjacent interference but by then, what will the world be like? |
|
Author: Kjunguy Wednesday, December 13, 2006 - 8:00 am |
|
With 104.3 in Chehalis, there is no way KFSH is going to move on that channel. |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Wednesday, December 13, 2006 - 6:32 pm |
|
How about small towns having licensed FM stations? |
|
Author: Tadc Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 3:12 pm |
|
Not until they find a way to pay for them. |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 3:48 pm |
|
How many more FMs does Portland need? |
|
Author: 62kgw Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 4:26 pm |
|
It does not matter if a newport station is making money or not, the point is if there is a way to move it down the highway, to a place where it can make MORE dough (and/or lower expenses), then pack up and call the moving van. |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Thursday, December 14, 2006 - 7:38 pm |
|
What do you mean? |
|
Author: Tadc Friday, December 15, 2006 - 12:58 pm |
|
For the answer to be yes, Portland would need to have "enough" FMs that didn't suck. Since they mostly suck, the answer is no. |
|
Author: Radiodjm Saturday, December 16, 2006 - 9:05 pm |
|
62kgw must not know some stations believe in community. Of course that went out of the portland market years ago. KYTE in newport has been approached to move at least three times in the last 20 years and each time rejected so that the central coast can have a big signal committed to serving its area. |
|
Author: Digitaldextor Sunday, December 17, 2006 - 9:52 am |
|
What places could KYTE have moved to? |
|
Author: Andy_brown Sunday, December 17, 2006 - 1:16 pm |
|
Rearranging bandwidth allocations has only become an option as a result of broad consolidation of ownership, in itself the big error the government made and now must live with. Moving assignments around has NOTHING to do with serving the community and EVERYTHING to do with $$$$$. Radio is all about selling commercials to buyers and that's all it's about. Anyone clinging to some historical notion of community service should wake up. |
|
Author: 62kgw Sunday, December 17, 2006 - 4:38 pm |
|
Even if the present owners are committed to the community, eventually they will sell. The next owner might not give a rip about the newport community, thus might just make purchase as part of bigger scheme to shuffle frequencies around such that one gets added to a bigger market. |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, December 18, 2006 - 1:16 am |
|
When did KTRO switch to stereo? I see KPDQ is still mono. |
|
Author: Broadway Monday, December 18, 2006 - 6:39 am |
|
Not meant to be in stereo...glitch's with the transmitter due to weather last week...will notify engineering. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, December 20, 2006 - 1:48 am |
|
It was still in stereo the last time I checked. |
|
Author: 62kgw Monday, January 08, 2007 - 2:03 pm |
|
How come 910 KKISN is low power this afternoon? |
|
Author: Kent_randles Monday, January 08, 2007 - 7:26 pm |
|
Tower #3 repair. Now that the guy anchors have been stabilized: obstruction lamp and beacon fixtures have been replaced with LED ones. |
|
Author: 62kgw Monday, January 08, 2007 - 7:38 pm |
|
Kent, what was the (low) power output? It seemed quite weak this afternoon. Was the pattern different than normal? I then heard some funny noises around 4:45, more than the usual nitetime mode changover interruption. Was the older transmitter on? Please tell us more, if you have time? |
|
Author: Radioboy25 Monday, January 08, 2007 - 7:45 pm |
|
kisn died today |
|
Author: Stoner Monday, January 08, 2007 - 7:56 pm |
|
Black Monday at Kisn today...all automation...all the time! We will have a few live Saturdays left....sad. |
|
Author: Markandrews Monday, January 08, 2007 - 8:36 pm |
|
NOOO!! SAY IT AIN'T SO!!! |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, January 08, 2007 - 9:11 pm |
|
It's been my default station since I was 6! I was hoping we'd make it to 50. I hope they keep the KISN identity. I don't quite know what to say. I may need a couple of years to think about it. |
|
Author: Kkb Monday, January 08, 2007 - 9:30 pm |
|
Stoner- you should go over to KHITS! |
|
Author: Stoner Tuesday, January 09, 2007 - 4:30 am |
|
Khits wants no part of the old Stoner...The format is too tight for me anyway to have any fun with it...and I never came back for a paycheck anyway. I'm currently working on a new deal & very excited about it. I will wind it down with Kisn with a few more shows. My guess is Kisn will have a new ownership soon which will be interesting. That is my hunch. Why Khits did not grab John Williams & Scotty is a great mystery to me. They are both dedicated pros & I was proud to work with those guys. Pro's to the end at the Mighty 91. |
|
Author: Radiogiant Tuesday, January 09, 2007 - 10:36 am |
|
I don't think anyone can honestly say they get into radio for the paycheck. You really like what you do...that is the only reason....unless your just a lazy SOB (not going to name names--but they are in the eugene market) who just sit read the paper and collect the $$$$$$ |
|
Author: Nwokie Tuesday, January 09, 2007 - 11:06 am |
|
Stoner, thanks for all the memories. |
|
Author: 62kgw Tuesday, January 09, 2007 - 9:05 pm |
|
When did the KXL transmitter move to Sherwood? |
|
Author: Markandrews Tuesday, January 09, 2007 - 9:35 pm |
|
The KXL transmitter site is still on a hill in the Damascus area... |
|
Author: Jimbo Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 2:17 am |
|
Not really much of a hill. Just south of Downtown Damascus. Been there since they vacated the Sunnyside site. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 2:54 am |
|
plateau |
|
Author: 62kgw Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 10:55 am |
|
How come the telephone company thinks the KXL Transmitter is in Sherwood? |
|
Author: Markandrews Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 11:37 am |
|
FCC Regs...or else! (One of the few remaining teeth in the FCC regs, come to think of it...) |
|
Author: Notalent Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 12:01 pm |
|
There is no FCC regulation specifying LED tower lights. |
|
Author: Tadc Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 12:29 pm |
|
I imagine it's an FAA reg that requires lights. |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 1:05 pm |
|
Both the FAA and FCC have regulations about tower lights. Some 16 years ago, WOKJ (Jackson, MS) had their license revoked because of non-functioning tower lights that they refused to fix. |
|
Author: Notalent Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 1:12 pm |
|
The regulations about tower lights dont specify whether they are LED or incandescent. that was my point. |
|
Author: 62kgw Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 1:19 pm |
|
They could use whale oil, that would save electricity. There might be some out of work lighthouse keepers available to trim the wicks each day. |
|
Author: Chaplain Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 3:24 pm |
|
Oh great! Now you've gone and woken up Greenpeace! |
|
Author: Markandrews Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 4:00 pm |
|
I stand corrected...It is, indeed, FAA specifications for obstruction lighting. (My cold medicine hasn't worn off yet...) |
|
Author: Billboise Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 6:46 pm |
|
Look at it as a long term investment. LED lamps last maybe 10-12 years longer and use 90% less power than incandescents. |
|
Author: Billboise Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 6:47 pm |
|
Look at it as a long term investment. LED lamps last maybe 10-12 years longer and use 90% less power than incandescents. And the cost of someone climbing those towers every year or so is quite high. |
|
Author: Jimbo Wednesday, January 10, 2007 - 11:01 pm |
|
....There must be one helluva lot of LEDs in those tower lights. Anybody know details?.... |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 1:07 pm |
|
According to Dialight's webpage, it appears that most, if not all, of their beacons use a relatively low number of high power LEDs as opposed to arrays of 100+ 5mm LEDs. |
|
Author: Billboise Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 7:22 pm |
|
LED's are being used in emergency vehicle light bars, even replacing strobes. Brighter and use 16 amps 'sted of 60 amps. Saw them on brand new Explorer sheriff trucks. Very low profile. |
|
Author: 62kgw Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 7:49 pm |
|
If Entercrime is trying to dump 910, then they would not be worried about replacing tower lights in the future, and not worried about electric bills, so why spend bucks for fancy new LED lights? OR is this example of realtor's advice to put new lighting in to brighten up the place to appleal to buyers? |
|
Author: Kent_randles Thursday, January 11, 2007 - 8:41 pm |
|
Version 3 of the LED beacons, that were featured in Dialight's SBE meeting presentation on Tuesday the 9th, have fewer and brighter LED's than previous versions, and a reflector. Earlier versions had MANY more LED's and no reflector. |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Friday, January 12, 2007 - 7:54 pm |
|
Without derailing the discussion too far off topic, are there reliability issues when really big arrays of LEDs are used? The photos that I remember seeing of the older LED tower lights had what looked like hundreds of 5mm LEDs; I didn't realize that those beacons had been made by Dialight, too. I have noted that LED traffic lights and tail lights sometimes have groups of LEDs that glow dimly, flicker, or don't glow at all. When I started seeing these types of failures, I was pretty dismayed because I had expected that LEDs and modern circuit board assembly techniques would be robust enough to work for decades. Did Dialight address this issue at all in their presentation? |
|
Author: 62kgw Friday, January 12, 2007 - 9:28 pm |
|
The more connections you have, the more opportunities for failures. If printed circuit board is involved, there is possible bad solder joints, with that too. Poor solder joints might behave ok for a couple years until lots of hot cold cycles lets corrosion begin, then you have an intermittant, or an open. |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Friday, January 12, 2007 - 9:50 pm |
|
My educated guess is that, indeed, this type of failure with LED arrays happens because of circuit board corrosion. Since LEDs run pretty cool, I could see how one could get condensation on the circuit board if the LED array is not properly sealed. I remember reading that Dialight potted most of the components of their LED arrays, presumably to protect them from moisture. This had the side effect of making them non-serviceable in the field. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 4:47 pm |
|
Jan 11, 2007... old WOR tower demolition: |
|
Author: Notalent Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 5:22 pm |
|
They already have the new digital towers operational! |
|
Author: Jr_tech Wednesday, January 17, 2007 - 6:37 pm |
|
Apparently the old towers could handle IBOC HD ok...The move was prompted by the desire to use the land for a luxury golf-course development. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Wednesday, January 24, 2007 - 3:22 am |
|
KRKO Could Begin 50KW Construction This Summer. |
|
Author: Billboise Wednesday, January 24, 2007 - 2:43 pm |
|
KNRQ 97.9 Eugene just filed to move to Tualatin, 940 watts ERP. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Wednesday, January 24, 2007 - 4:05 pm |
|
That would leave quite a hole on the FM band in Eugene, with nothing between 96.1 and 99.1. Maybe, Newport's 97.5 KSHL could move into Eugene at 97.7? |
|
Author: Greenway Wednesday, January 24, 2007 - 4:08 pm |
|
I can get KRKO OK at night sometimes--but,hey,doncha just LOOOOvvvve that local owner? |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, January 24, 2007 - 8:52 pm |
|
OK, we're looking at 940 watts at 470 meters HAAT from the Skyline tower. I wonder where KRRC will move if it's approved and I can't see why it wouldn't be. At some point, whoever eventually ends up with this station will probably do some shuffling to get more power. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Thursday, January 25, 2007 - 12:54 am |
|
It looks like Hood River's 105.5 KCGB has moved to it's new site. Can anyone hear it in Portland? KCGB has a new translator at 96.9 in The Dalles. |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, January 25, 2007 - 1:04 am |
|
That's a long way from Portland and it's still a Class A. While it appears to put a fair amount of signal into The Dalles, it doesn't seem to go as far west as North Bonneville. I doubt if anyone has any kind of reliable reception in the Portland area. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Thursday, January 25, 2007 - 1:17 am |
|
From the old site, I could hear 105.5 KCGB on I-84, in spots between 148th and 181st. |
|
Author: E_dawg Thursday, January 25, 2007 - 2:56 pm |
|
I thought that the original plan was to move 97.7 from The Dalles in to Portland and move 107.9 Albany to 103.7 and move 97.9 Eugene to 107.9, and 103.7 Lebannon to Paisey Oregon. I'm I wrong on this? |
|
Author: Radioxpert Thursday, January 25, 2007 - 7:36 pm |
|
That was the original proposal, which hit a road-block with the FAA. |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, January 25, 2007 - 9:20 pm |
|
This isn't a proposal. They don't need one anymore. It's a direct application. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, January 26, 2007 - 12:59 am |
|
Yes, it's amazing that the FCC now considers this kind of move a "minor modification". |
|
Author: E_dawg Friday, January 26, 2007 - 8:51 pm |
|
So 97.9 is going to be a Class A station or Class C3 for Tualatin? Also, will 97.7 KACI-FM relocate to 97.5 or 98.3 for 97.9? |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, January 26, 2007 - 8:58 pm |
|
I don't know what KACI is going to do now. My guess is that they will be offered a substantial sum to relocate so KNRQ can have more power, once they move to Skyline. KNRQ applied for a Class C3 with 940 watts @ 470 meters HAAT. |
|
Author: E_dawg Friday, January 26, 2007 - 9:48 pm |
|
940 watts? That is a peeshooter for the Portland market, can they be a class c2? |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, January 26, 2007 - 11:13 pm |
|
If KACI-FM could be paid to downgrade to a C3, Portland's 97.9 could upgrade to a C2. |
|
Author: Semoochie Saturday, January 27, 2007 - 1:56 am |
|
If KACI were out of the picture, they could probably be a C1. I believe the Rainier station is holding them back from higher power. |
|
Author: E_dawg Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 6:33 pm |
|
What about KCYS 98.1 in Seaside, I think it will prevent from KNRQ to be a class C1. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 7:14 pm |
|
You're probably right. It's hard to keep track of all these new stations. They might be able to move it though. |
|
Author: Notalent Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 7:32 pm |
|
i think the correct term is PEAshooter. |
|
Author: E_dawg Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 8:27 pm |
|
I'm tryin to think if there's any way for 97.7 KACI-FM to move to another channel. 97.5 would be impossible due to 97.5 in Tri-Cities, and KNLR in Bend, 98.3, forget it due to KEYW, the only other frequency would work is 95.1, but would it be too close to KIOK? |
|
Author: Randy_in_eugene Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 9:06 pm |
|
There's also 95.1 in Prineville, and in Monmouth/Salem. |
|
Author: E_dawg Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 9:24 pm |
|
95.1 in Primeville is Moving to 95.7. Whoops, I forgot about KSND 95.1 in Salem Or. |
|
Author: E_dawg Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 9:27 pm |
|
Also, does anybody thinks Culumus will move 96.1 KZEL to Portland to 96.3? |
|
Author: Billboise Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 9:47 pm |
|
And you thought the FM auctions were fun. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, January 28, 2007 - 11:47 pm |
|
There's another 96.1 in Vancouver BC that would probably prevent KXXO from moving to the other tower and I don't see them giving up any Seattle coverage. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, January 29, 2007 - 1:46 am |
|
96.1 KXXO should be able to move to 99.3 KDDS-FM's tower, without a problem. (If Vancouver's 99.3 CFOX isn't a problem for KDDS-FM, then 96.1 CHKG shouldn't be a problem for KXXO.) Interference sharing has been allowed between the U.S. and Canada. Bellingham's 92.9 KISM and Vancouver's 93.1 CKYE are only 45 miles apart, and (unless you're using a narrow FM tuner) they splatter all over each other! |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, January 29, 2007 - 2:08 am |
|
Another good point! I have to get out more. |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 1:21 am |
|
...and now for my next miracle! KWLZ Warm Springs has applied to move to West Linn(I wonder if they heard me)on 96.3 as a Class C3. It's for 2.9kw directional(everywhere but south)from the Stonehenge tower at 297 meters HAAT. This is part of a contingent application with KXXO Olympia applying to relocate to South Mountain. Kudos to E-Dawg for suggesting the last part; he just had the wrong station. This should wreak havoc with any number of LPFMs and translators. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 1:40 am |
|
I was thinking that KWLZ would want to beat KZEL to the punch. Good call! |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 10:51 am |
|
It's further south. Is it actually closer? |
|
Author: Jr_tech Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 11:02 am |
|
CP for a 100 watt LP (on 96.3) in Hillsboro, I assume that it would get "bumped" if 96.1 or 96.3 were to move into the area ? |
|
Author: Broadway Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 11:25 am |
|
Also one in McMinnville, Woodburn, Salem and the Satellator on Mt Scott...all 96.3...a major bump of up to 4 stations in the area... |
|
Author: E_dawg Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 1:31 pm |
|
Now, there is 1 place left on the FM dial for the Portland market. After the propose move-in of 96.3 and 97.9. (102.7FM) Now does anybody has some suggestions moving 103.3 to 103.5 and 104.1 to 104.3? |
|
Author: E_dawg Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 7:21 pm |
|
See, I told you about 96.3 coming to Portland. |
|
Author: E_dawg Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 8:50 pm |
|
Now I can see what Portland FM dial will be like. |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Tuesday, January 30, 2007 - 11:12 pm |
|
Or how about grouping the stations by antenna farms. And listed by order of power. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, January 31, 2007 - 12:43 am |
|
I'd list Sylvan first since they're going up to 501 meters. It just occurred to me that KWLZ won't have to change call letters when they move to West Linn because it sounds like they are already there. |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 12:31 pm |
|
KTIL has applied to move to Government Camp! It's a Class C2 on 94.3. |
|
Author: E_dawg Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 1:47 pm |
|
Oh! BTW, what will happen to KRRC 97.9? Where will they go? Since all of the PDX radio dial will be full. |
|
Author: Broadway Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 3:35 pm |
|
>>KTIL has applied to move to Government Camp! It's a Class C2 on 94.3. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 7:51 pm |
|
94.3 would be able serve Gresham quite nicely. Maybe, 1230 KMUZ's format will move to 94.3? |
|
Author: Rsb569 Thursday, February 01, 2007 - 8:31 pm |
|
Oh I hope not. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, February 02, 2007 - 2:12 am |
|
It looks like KNRQ didn't know about KACI applying to move closer to Portland and are now shortspaced as a Class C3. To alleviate this, they have modified to Class A. I presume this is a temporary measure. They say they can cover Tualatin from Skyline with 70dbu, even at the reduced power. Somehow, I find that hard to believe. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, February 02, 2007 - 2:17 am |
|
I wonder if Cumulus is in the process of making an offer to take care of KACI-FM. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, February 02, 2007 - 9:30 am |
|
I'm sure they'll come up with something. They dropped to a Class A so the applications wouldn't be mutually exclusive. That could tie things up for quite awhile. |
|
Author: Robin_mitchell Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 2:22 pm |
|
NRQ missed 80-90 docket a number of years ago, and has not had to drop 100KW only because it has remained "grandfathered" on the same antenna with no changes. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Saturday, February 03, 2007 - 5:44 pm |
|
If 97.9 moves to Portland, Newport's 97.5 KSHL could move into Eugene, as a class A at 97.7. |
|
Author: Dexter Wednesday, February 07, 2007 - 7:28 am |
|
Forgive me if this isn't the place for this question, but does anybody have owndership information? |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Saturday, February 10, 2007 - 1:26 am |
|
The www.fybush.com tour of the Pacific Northwest has begun. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 12:22 am |
|
Here comes another one! The Mount Angel station has been granted. It's on 1130 with 25kw directional toward Portland! Add that to 10kw on 1150. |
|
Author: 62kgw Sunday, February 11, 2007 - 10:00 am |
|
Everytime I tune to 1150 at night, the signal seems just as strong as it does in the daytime. |
|
Author: Tadc Tuesday, February 13, 2007 - 2:15 pm |
|
25kw to the north? Won't that make the folks at CKNW kinda upset? |
|
Author: Microphone Tuesday, February 13, 2007 - 2:28 pm |
|
To Dexter: |
|
Author: Semoochie Tuesday, February 13, 2007 - 8:53 pm |
|
It's only directional toward us in the daytime. At night, they drop to 490 watts and reverse the pattern. I believe you meant CKWX. CKNW is on 980. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, February 16, 2007 - 11:33 pm |
|
I see we have a new K-Love translator. It's on 95.9 with 19 watts and licensed to Tigard. At no time did I lose it on my way home. On the other hand, it didn't come in very well either. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Friday, February 16, 2007 - 11:55 pm |
|
K240CZ is most likely replacing KLVP 1040 AM. |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Sunday, February 18, 2007 - 10:27 pm |
|
Flybush Media is now in the Beaver State. www.fybush.com |
|
Author: Vgis Sunday, February 18, 2007 - 10:53 pm |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Thursday, February 22, 2007 - 4:43 am |
|
Looks like 1080 went off the air for something. |
|
Author: Semoochie Saturday, March 03, 2007 - 9:17 pm |
|
This is huge news and I can't believe I haven't heard anything about it until now! The FCC has rescinded ALL presunrise and post-sunset authorizations for the former daytimers and will replace them with new ones. The new levels are reported to be far lower than what many stations have had! I presume this means that stations that have had the good fortune to sign on at 500 watts for the last 40 years are going to be in for a rude awakening! It's effective March 11. Imagine not ever being able to sell the first hour or 2 of morning drive again! |
|
Author: Craig_adams Saturday, March 03, 2007 - 9:58 pm |
|
Yes! I remember reading about this in All Access last month. Didn't think to post it and now I can't find it. Did find something on it in Radio World: |
|
Author: Semoochie Saturday, March 03, 2007 - 11:10 pm |
|
That's the article I saw too. I wonder if there's a way to find out what the new levels are other than attempting to contact each station. This could really hurt some standalones! |
|
Author: Billboise Sunday, March 04, 2007 - 8:16 pm |
|
From the public notice :DA 07-938 |
|
Author: Robin_mitchell Monday, March 05, 2007 - 7:11 am |
|
I believe this roll-back is merely to compensate for the new earlier Daylight Savings time start, and only covers this 3-week period....but none of us will know until we see the "roll-backs" on a chart for specific stations. However, it could just be an FCC excuse to fix earlier screw-ups on their part, too. |
|
Author: Radiogiant Monday, March 05, 2007 - 1:28 pm |
|
Hey Robin....so who's choice was it to leave Cumulus...it must have been yours if your still around as a consultant....Also what is the status of "The Moose" movin to a bigger stick ? |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, March 05, 2007 - 7:35 pm |
|
I don't understand what daylight savings time has to do with power levels. They've always been based on standard time. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, March 05, 2007 - 7:44 pm |
|
Whatever Robin may know, he probably isn't able to discuss it. |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, March 05, 2007 - 9:14 pm |
|
They're finally having the power levels discussion on the engineering board of radio-info.com. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 1:58 am |
|
It looks like the FCC has cancelled 1640's construction permit for 10kw directional nighttime per the applicants request. I wonder if someone knows anything about that. Ok, I found out where they list PSA & PSSA powers on CDBS. It's under "station info". For each station you type in, at the bottom of the page is a correspondence folder. When you click on that, up comes PSRA and PSSA links. 1010 is 1 watt presunrise and between 1 and 2 postsunset. Incidentally, it looks like critical hours is down to 500 watts from 1.1kw. 1150 keeps its 500 watts presunrise but first hour of PSSA is no more than 50 watts and the second hour is 10 watts. The highest power before was over 200 watts with 47 watts the second hour. 1410 was a big surprise. I may have been basing their power on their former site. PSRA is 12 watts and PSSA is listed as 500 for the first hour and 198 for the second! |
|
Author: Roger Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 6:02 am |
|
z100 tower suck so do pre sunrise operation if no r n b then how bout picture of snoopy dogg doggy hangin from mooovin antena |
|
Author: Billboise Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 5:35 pm |
|
From the FCC today, "Never Mind. Forget we said anything". |
|
Author: 62kgw Wednesday, March 07, 2007 - 6:29 pm |
|
Why is the fcc's web address named after a waterfall in Iceland? |
|
Author: Radioxpert Friday, March 16, 2007 - 2:01 am |
|
GCC has applied to make some major changes in Bend. They've applied to move KXIX, Bend (C0) from 94.1 to 92.9, while moving KRXF, Sunriver (C2) from 92.7 to 94.1. This would leave room for 94.3 (C2) in Government Camp. |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Friday, March 16, 2007 - 10:02 am |
|
Meanwhile on the TV side in Bend. KTVZ will be putting in a new LPTV. The station will be called KQRE-LP. Which will carry programing from Telemundo. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 8:47 pm |
|
I finally broke down and bought an HD Radio. I drove south today to check out the various signals. I listened to KNRK HD2. The first dropout was at the Keiser exit. It was mostly OK up to about Market Street. I switched to KIJZ HD2 and it first dropped out at about Turner. I turned around at the Jefferson exit, unable to lock onto any other Portland stations. I switched back to KKCW and it was steady. It may have lasted longer going south if I had it locked in earlier. I switched to KZEL HD for several seconds and it was fine. I decided to try KEX. It didn't lock in until after Turner. From there on, it bounced back and forth until I got to Keiser which means it didn't have a better HD signal south than KNRK. By the time I thought it was solid, I switched to KBPS HD and it was fine. I checked 1330 and it didn't try to come in HD until past Wilsonville. It locked in for good at around I-205. I would say that exceeds 60dbu by a long shot in a lot of cases. I consider this a success from a listeners standpoint. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 8:59 pm |
|
Thanks for the report! (I'm still using the analog-only factory unit in the car.) Which HD Radio unit are you using? Some have reported picking up Portland FM HD, fairly close to Eugene. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 9:01 pm |
|
Speaking of HD, I heard what sounded like IBOC HD "buzz" on Bend's 100.7 KMGX. |
|
Author: Qpatrickedwards Sunday, March 18, 2007 - 10:15 pm |
|
I just picked up a Sangean HDT-1 HD component tuner today (mainly needed it to monitor analogue RDS/RBDS) but I tried the HD and the audio quality actually suprised me. I was expecting artifact filled audio like XM or Sirius, but from my first impression, HD Radio seems to have the artifacting to a minimum. |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, March 19, 2007 - 12:55 am |
|
KBOO is on the Stonehenge tower! I wonder why you aren't having any problem with them. If this sounds familiar, I wrote the same thing a day or 2 ago but qualified it with "unless they've moved". This time, I checked and it's still there but you really had me going for a minute! Incidentally, there was a significant dropout in the Terwilliger curves on KRSK-HD2 but just about anything from Sylvan or Skyline is usually ripped to shreds there anyway, being right up against a portion of the west hills. I drove through a wooded, hilly area south of the Milwaukie Expressway and it was rock solid so apparently, the signal has to be comparatively weak from distance or multipath has to be pretty bad before there's a problem. If you're waiting for the price to come down before buying one of these things, I can only say, it has. How much would you expect to pay for an AM-FM CD with controls for XM, Serius, MP3, wavefiles and CD changer, all with a 7 band equalizer, 5.1 surround sound and remote control if it DIDN'T have HD Radio? Mine was under $200, making it the cheapest after market in-dash unit I've ever purchased! It's a JVC KD-HDR1 and I was out of the store after installation in less than 1.5 hours and only because I left and came back! By the way, in my driveway, 103.7 comes in much better than it did as do 104.7 and 101.5! I can also actually hear 90.3 now. I see I misspelled "Keizer" twice in my previous post. I'll try not to let it happen again. Another thing: I wasn't particularly thrilled with the sound on KEX. It may have been the processing but I would think they would know better. It's certainly a lot better than any AM I've ever heard but wouldn't really say it sounds like FM either. One thing's for sure though: It sounds a whole lot better that what was on 1330's HD! |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, March 19, 2007 - 1:11 am |
|
Yes, AM "HD" doesn't sound much like analog FM. The watery artifacts are quite noticable, but I'll take it, over the sound of today's analog AM tuners. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Monday, March 19, 2007 - 9:34 am |
|
Semoochie: |
|
Author: Qpatrickedwards Monday, March 19, 2007 - 10:05 am |
|
The lower power on KBOO might be why I can receive it and not KGON or Charlie.(lower power seems to equal less multipath.) |
|
Author: Qpatrickedwards Monday, March 19, 2007 - 6:45 pm |
|
No KZEL HD and spotty KWAX HD. We're just in too lousy of a location for Blanton stuff. |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, March 22, 2007 - 10:43 pm |
|
There's something I'd like to say about HD that came as a surprise to me: I keep hearing that the difference between HD and standard FM is "barely perceivable" or some such phrase. This simply isn't true. The difference is tremendous! Bass is tight and treble sparkles against a background of dead quieting! It sounds more like a compact disk than standard FM, even at freeway speeds. Anyone who thinks otherwise must either be listening to an overly processed station or has lousier speakers than I do! This has got to be the coolest thing ever! I can barely wait to get back in the car so I can listen some more! |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, March 23, 2007 - 1:37 am |
|
It looks like the FCC has given final authorization to HD Radio including translators, boosters, LPFMs and nighttime broadcasting for AM stations. |
|
Author: Kent_randles Friday, March 23, 2007 - 6:48 pm |
|
KBOO actually uses "mid-level" combining, two transmitters: one FM and one FM+IBOC. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Friday, March 23, 2007 - 8:00 pm |
|
Ah! Anyway, KBOO IBOC is combined with their analog and goes along with it to the "master antenna", while most of the other stations at Stonehenge put their IBOC on aux antennas, at a lower level on the tower, possibly causing a weaker IBOC signal at a distance... or has this changed? |
|
Author: Kent_randles Monday, March 26, 2007 - 1:21 pm |
|
At Stonehenge KNRK is "high-level" combined into a 1-bay antenna at the top of the tower, FM and HD transmitters combined after their outputs. 90% of the HD transmitter power is wasted in the process. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Monday, March 26, 2007 - 3:02 pm |
|
At a tower site, in the hills above Lincoln city, KWJJ was the *only* HD that I could receive from Stonehenge. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Monday, April 09, 2007 - 9:17 pm |
|
KBPS Public Radio Foundation's Gleneden Beach C.P. gets calls KQAC for 88.5MHz. 100 watts ERP. Antenna: 20. meters HAAT; 111. meters AMSL & 24. meters AGL. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Monday, April 09, 2007 - 10:41 pm |
|
All Classical, with the Q perhaps being a tie-in to KQHR 90.1 (KBPS-FM in Hood River). |
|
Author: Craig_adams Monday, April 09, 2007 - 11:38 pm |
|
Sounds like a winner to me. |
|
Author: Billboise Wednesday, April 18, 2007 - 12:44 pm |
|
AM STATION APPLICATIONS FOR ASSIGNMENT OF LICENSE GRANTED |
|
Author: Jr_tech Sunday, May 13, 2007 - 4:23 pm |
|
Tower work starts Santa Catalina fire: |
|
Author: Craig_adams Tuesday, June 05, 2007 - 9:49 pm |
|
A Slice from the past. Reality sets in, after the initial news that the new 50,000 watt KPNW signal would be heard in the Portland area as well as KUGN. |
|
Author: Randy_in_eugene Tuesday, June 05, 2007 - 11:34 pm |
|
KPNW is great in Roseburg, sounding nearly local. At the time they signed on 1120 there was little competition south of Eugene, therefore they used to have a large following in Douglas County. |
|
Author: Qpatrickedwards Wednesday, June 06, 2007 - 5:35 am |
|
On my last trip to Chilliwack BC, I was suprised to hear KPNW over CKWX's splatter in the early evenings. (I guess I probably shouldn't be suprised about that since CKWX doesn't send much signal eastward down the Fraser Valley at night.) |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, June 06, 2007 - 1:03 pm |
|
KGAY had changed calls to KYKN before they had nighttime authorization. KPNW used to have a daytime directional pattern that reached far further north than it currently does. I used to pick them up around Washington Square and anything south of that. At some point, it appears they switched to running their nighttime pattern during the day. |
|
Author: Newflyer Wednesday, June 06, 2007 - 8:05 pm |
|
Anyone else notice the City of Portland is budgeting to replace the 800MHz tower on Council Crest? I'd been to some of the budget forums earlier this year; didn't realize this stayed in there until pulling up Vol. 1. of the current proposed city budget. |
|
Author: Billboise Thursday, June 07, 2007 - 8:10 pm |
|
Don't know much about the old pre-1976 KPNW. |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, June 07, 2007 - 11:45 pm |
|
A little bit farther north? It doesn't come in here at all anymore; You used to be able to hear it all day, not well but you could hear it and the valley was solid! |
|
Author: Jr_tech Friday, June 08, 2007 - 10:42 am |
|
looks like the pattern has a good lobe from the Northwest to the Southwest: |
|
Author: Broadway Friday, June 08, 2007 - 11:14 am |
|
Use to pick it up almost as a local station when it first went on 1120 AM around 1969-1970. Remember it as a "new station" on my 8 transister radio attached to my belt moving irrigation pipe in the peppermint fields outside of Independence-Monmouth. |
|
Author: Notalent Friday, June 08, 2007 - 11:33 am |
|
The antenna system was in dissarray due to lack of maintenance until CC bought the station and fixed everything. that happened shortly after the CC purchase. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, June 08, 2007 - 10:13 pm |
|
...supposed to be originally at night and later on, all the time. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Saturday, June 09, 2007 - 7:57 pm |
|
The May-June "FMedia!" reports: K284BF 104.7Mhz Chapman OR is adding horizontal. At present it's licensed for 16 watts at 292 meters. Chapman OR is 9 miles north of Scappoose on Oregon Hwy. 47. The antenna however looks to be on the Skyline Tower. |
|
Author: Notalent Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 12:12 am |
|
Being a translator anyone wishing to hear KDUK can file a formal complaint which would cause them to have to shut this off. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 12:26 am |
|
I know several KDUK listeners in the Portland area, who certainly will complain. "Way FM" is wasting their time, building this translator for 104.7 MHz. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 12:36 am |
|
I don't think you can "reasonably" hear KDUK anywhere near the Skyline Tower. I can "reasonably" hear it on 1-205, just north of Clackamas Town Center. I'll guess about 45dbu. How far does this rule go? Can translators be prohibited around Astoria because Seattle FMs just happen to come in on the north shore? |
|
Author: Notalent Sunday, June 10, 2007 - 10:47 am |
|
the law does not specify where one must be... if you are trying to listen to KDUK (or any full class station) and any translator is interfering then that translator is fair game to be shut off for interfering with a licensed broadcaster. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, June 11, 2007 - 1:08 am |
|
Seattle FM's are commonly listened to in Astoria. (I heard "I-107-7" playing in Astoria's Shakey's, back in 1990.) This is why there are no translators broadcasting on Seattle frequencies in Astoria. However, there are full class Seaside/Cannon Beach FM's on 94.9 and 98.1. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, June 24, 2007 - 11:31 pm |
|
I was listening to KEX's HD and finally heard some music. I would have to say now that it does indeed sound like FM! I may have been thrown off by the choice of microphones or something else but when it comes to music, I really do think it sounds like FM. All of this leads up to my real point: Is there any reason KEX can't be nondirectional at night? I believe that they had to protect WOWO Fort Wayne, IN and vice versa but WOWO gave up their clear channel rights for a sister station in New York. I believe that frees KEX of any obligation. |
|
Author: Chrisweiss Monday, June 25, 2007 - 11:15 am |
|
There are too many other stations in this region on adjacent channels to go non-directional. While they had virtually no effect on WOWO, a major change on KEX would impact those established stations' nighttime coverage. From studying the potential for letting-out the KEX pattern we found that the minimal gains were not worth the time and money. |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, June 25, 2007 - 8:27 pm |
|
Thank you Chris, you're just the person I was hoping to hear from! So the thinking is, it could be done but why create more interference for little gain? I'm thinking, as the primary station on the frequency, they wouldn't have to protect anyone else. The only reason I bring this up at this late date is because I thought it might be easier to run HD if the station is nondirectional. I also thought it might be less stress on KPOJ. It was just a thought that occurred to me. Thanks again! |
|
Author: Radionut Tuesday, June 26, 2007 - 5:22 am |
|
"From studying the potential for letting-out the KEX pattern we found that the minimal gains were not worth the time and money." |
|
Author: Chrisweiss Tuesday, June 26, 2007 - 10:12 am |
|
The clear channel protections for a frequency cannot just default over to another station based on a perceived historical "squatters rights". There are stations in WA, UT, CA, NV and Canada that were licensed before the WOWO downgrade. They sufficiently protected WOWO, and sat in the nulls of KEX as well. Those stations are still afforded protections that KEX must continue to meet. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, June 27, 2007 - 10:40 am |
|
Thank you for a very thorough answer! As I said, it was only a passing thought. Now, if they EVER print this in the Federal Register, we can get going. |
|
Author: Radionut Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 2:39 am |
|
Chrisweiss, Has the pattern changed that much on KPOJ since going to 10 kW at night that it no longer can be heard north of Seattle? The last time I spent the weekend in Everett the only station I could hear was CKRM in Regina, SK on 620 and it was very clear. On the same note, since CKRM went to 10 kW at night a number of years ago, they seem to have increased their signal in our direction. You can hear them equal and over KPOJ some nights in southern Oregon. And even heard them locally in the null of KPOJ. |
|
Author: Chrisweiss Thursday, June 28, 2007 - 10:08 pm |
|
I don't think the pattern is that different than the old 5 kw pattern. Although it's been awhile since I did work with that initial license from the Clackamas site. The current nighttime pattern has a null toward KCIS in Edmund, WA. It looks like Everett would fall in the center of that null as well. |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, July 25, 2007 - 4:08 pm |
|
The long time analog TV application for channel 40 has been dismissed. It looks like the FCC is just now getting around to some of these. |
|
Author: Newflyer Wednesday, July 25, 2007 - 4:32 pm |
|
And I bet if the multiple 105.9 applications weren't sold to Jacor back in 1998, they'd probably just be getting around to that as well. |
|
Author: Billboise Wednesday, July 25, 2007 - 5:22 pm |
|
The old & New 620 coverage maps: |
|
Author: Craig_adams Monday, August 20, 2007 - 4:12 am |
|
In the Sunday Oregonian, The "O" Section, page O8 there is a picture (an aerial photo) of Oaks Park in 1949 during a flood. In the middle is a tower and a transmitter house on stilts to the back. This would have been KBKO 1290kc but was originally built and used in 1936 thru 48 for KWJJ. |
|
Author: Washnotore2 Monday, August 20, 2007 - 1:14 pm |
|
Craig, |
|
Author: Craig_adams Monday, August 20, 2007 - 6:39 pm |
|
Didn't know Oaks Park displayed old pictures. The picture I'm talking about above is most likely not among the displayed pictures, since it came from The Oregonian photo archives. |
|
Author: E_dawg Thursday, August 23, 2007 - 7:35 pm |
|
Q: When can we expect 96.3 & 97.9 to be approved? How long does the application takes? |
|
Author: Notalent Thursday, August 23, 2007 - 8:34 pm |
|
i believe that E_dawg and Djfresh are one and the same. |
|
Author: Semoochie Friday, August 24, 2007 - 12:21 am |
|
There are informal objections to both applications and also the matter of Canadian clearance, which usually takes about a year. I think E_dawg has been posting longer than Djfresh has been alive! |
|
Author: Notalent Friday, August 24, 2007 - 7:42 am |
|
E dawg posted this very "djfrresh" ish gem in the seattle board: |
|
Author: E_dawg Friday, August 24, 2007 - 6:51 pm |
|
NOpe, I'm not djfresh. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Thursday, August 30, 2007 - 9:14 pm |
|
An Engineers Nightmare! |
|
Author: Littlesongs Monday, September 03, 2007 - 12:43 am |
|
"Scott Wayne Crook?!" -- of course he is a thief. Great find Craig! :o) |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, September 03, 2007 - 2:00 am |
|
OK, enough time has gone by. It's time again to rant and rave about the CBS master antenna not being installed yet on the Sylvan Tower. It was supposed to be taken care of in August. I don't see it going up on the tower yet so it's still going to be awhile before those 5 stations can transmit from their new site. What I'm really waiting for is the HD installation, which should take place at about the same time. I eagerly await the 5 new HD2 formats as well as much improved reception of the main channels and this will greatly improve coverage of KVMX, going from a Class C1 to a C0. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Monday, September 03, 2007 - 2:20 am |
|
Yes, what's the story with CBS? |
|
Author: Jr_tech Monday, September 03, 2007 - 10:26 am |
|
The only CP that I see on the FCC site for an antenna on the new tower (asrn 1207367) is held by KINK... I may have missed something, but where are the CPs for KLTH KUPL KUFO and KVMX ? |
|
Author: Semoochie Monday, September 03, 2007 - 11:25 am |
|
I brought this up earlier and Kent opined that perhaps, as long as there was one construction permit, maybe that was enough. The other stations could simply file for program test authority when the time came. Even then, you'd think the FCC would have a problem with the stations that aren't full Class Cs, particularly KVMX, going from C1 to C0. Maybe they just got busy and forgot about the other 4 CPs. KVMX holds a CP but for 440 meters @ 100kw. They'd have to reduce power to 71kw on the new antenna. |
|
Author: Jr_tech Monday, September 03, 2007 - 1:53 pm |
|
Interesting! When the 3 NCE stations moved to the new tower a couple of years ago, there were 3 separate CPs. Perhaps the common ownership of the CBS stations helps to reduce the FCC paperwork ? |
|
Author: Semoochie Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 6:23 pm |
|
KBPS-FM has applied for 6kw from its present site, up from 3.5kw. I suspect this to be the power level they would have without having to protect channel 6, which they will no longer need to do after February 2009. KOIN has already given the go-ahead. I expect to see similar applications from several of the noncomms in the near future. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 7:24 pm |
|
This "Towers & Such" thread is now over a year old. Next news poster should start a new thread. |
|
Author: Radioxpert Wednesday, September 12, 2007 - 9:05 pm |
|
How about an upgrade for 88.3 KBVM? |
|
Author: Semoochie Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 12:02 am |
|
KBVM is certainly on the list of stations that might gain from the lack of a local channel 6. Please continue thread under "Towers & Such - Here It Comes Again!" |
|
Author: Mrs_merkin Thursday, September 13, 2007 - 9:55 pm |
|
Semoochie, I just couldn't allow you to be the "thread killer" on this one, unless you wanted to be. (In that case, you know what to do) |
|
Author: Radiorat Sunday, September 23, 2007 - 1:20 pm |
|
where is the kink tower? |
|