Author: Semoochie Saturday, April 04, 2009 - 2:55 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mine doesn't seem to be working anymore. Is it still in effect? |
|
Author: Andrew2 Saturday, April 04, 2009 - 3:07 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I use Firefox's built-in spell checker on all the websites I use, including this one. This forum's built-in spell checker has never been particularly accurate anyway. Much better to use your browser's or get an add-on for it if you don't have one. |
|
Author: Roger Saturday, April 04, 2009 - 4:29 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Spell Check |
|
Author: Semoochie Saturday, April 04, 2009 - 8:43 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This will spell Doom! =:'D> (with a goatee) |
|
Author: Listenerpete Saturday, April 04, 2009 - 10:00 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Mi spel chekr worcs fiine. |
|
Author: Jimbo Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 2:25 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I don't use any spell checker other than my brain. I do have my Webster College Dictionary on the shelf, if needed, but haven't opened it in years. |
|
Author: Brianl Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 7:19 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
hookt en foniks werkt fer mee! |
|
Author: Dan_packard Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 7:24 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
See, who needs spell check, anyway? The spell checker on this board was pulled because it was pretty dumb and limited and just sucked up resources, basically. |
|
Author: Semoochie Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 10:47 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Thanks Dan, I thought something was wrong on my end. Andrew, thank you for your help as well. |
|
Author: Skeptical Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 12:13 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The spell checker on this board was pulled because it was pretty dumb |
|
Author: Trixter Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 1:35 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
HEY!!!!!! |
|
Author: Chickenjuggler Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 2:36 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Hey Dan, it was totally worth a shot. Thanks for at least trying it. I happen to agree with you pulling it - but even if I didn't, no big whup. |
|
Author: Missing_kskd Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 4:31 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Agreed! |
|
Author: Craig_adams Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 5:02 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Dan is right. Firefox Rocks! I just switched from Explorer a month ago. Everything runs better and faster. |
|
Author: Andrew2 Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 6:41 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
I've been using Firefox (or Mozilla) for years. While I use it 99% of the time, it has a few serious issues still. Biggest is terrible memory leaks - supposedly fixed in version 3.0 (and are better now for sure) but still there. What I mean is, as you keep Firefox open and running for a while, it gradually eats more and more RAM. For example, the FF process on my laptop has been open a few days and is eating 450MB of RAM, whereas if I closed the browser and re-opened all the windows, I'd be at about 100MB. Windows I've opened and closed don't give back all their RAM. Eventually the process gets so bloated I have to exit Firefox and re-start it. In version 2.0 it was far worse, though. |
|
Author: Craig_adams Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 8:28 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Firefox still beats Explorer on re-boots. With Explorer, I was re-booting just about every other day. Now I can go over a week! |
|
Author: Jr_tech Sunday, April 05, 2009 - 10:04 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Andrew2: |
|
Author: Alfredo_t Tuesday, April 07, 2009 - 10:38 am |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
The computer on which I'm writing this has Firefox 3.0.8. The spell-checker feature is a lifesaver. I am a bit embarrassed that the spell-checker catches me as often as it does because at one time--back in Junior High and High School--I considered myself a fairly good speller, and I did not have any tools other than the dictionary to check my spelling. Spelling and grammar matter to me because I want to show respect for the language, and I don't want to be associated with the things that non-standard usage and poor spelling bring to mind: sloppiness, a lack of education, a lack of intellect, and a chemically-induced altered state of consciousness, just to name a few! |
|
Author: Roger Tuesday, April 07, 2009 - 1:13 pm |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
....450MB of RAM,....... |
|