Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 11:13 am
Check out the pictures.
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,499189,00.html
They say the difference between a dog and a fox is a six pack.
There is not ENOUGH beer in the world for these two!
Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 11:31 am
thats just GROSS!
Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 7:55 pm
"Oh My Gawd" Was said out loud..just before I threw up in my mouth a little bit.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009 - 9:39 pm
yuck! Iim vomiting in my mouth!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 4:35 am
Hold on a minute. These girls weren't the actual prostitutes. They were just the pimps. You see if these girls had been who was having the actual sex, then I would be disgusted. But since they were just coordinators, I think it's fine.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 9:32 am
So would that make these girls pimps or madams? I have always been confused on that one?
Maybe they should join DECA and use this business model for a state competition, "Learn and Earn"
No wait thats Risky Business.
Time to remake that movie with Tom Cruise's character being played by a very unattractive obese black girl!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 9:32 am
That Prostitution rink would have zero clients if those two skanks were the ones having the actual sex.
GAWD! Why can't the hookers (These days) look like Julia Roberts?
OHHHHHHHHHHHHH PRETTY WOMAN!!!
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 6:27 pm
Buns,
Those aren't 'prostitutes'..they'd be called "call girls" or "escorts"..ya know,high-class-hookers.
:-p
Wednesday, February 25, 2009 - 7:42 pm
So Monkeyboy, are you saying I would have a better chance of getting A HOT (Julia Roberts type Hooker) If I go with a Call girl rather than a hooker??
DAMIT!!! They need to start teaching this in schools!
